Mental health among residents with different marital status in Liaoning province
-
摘要:
目的 分析辽宁省不同婚姻状况人群精神健康状况。 方法 使用2010年中国家庭动态追踪调查(CFPS)数据分析辽宁省居民婚姻及精神健康状况,选用抑郁自评量表(CES-D,即精神健康状况量表)对成年人精神状况进行分析。 结果 辽宁省居民离异人口占2.99 %,高于全国平均水平,不同婚姻状况精神健康得分在不同性别、城乡、年龄人群间差异有统计学意义,男性精神健康得分(27.05 ± 3.85)分,高于女性的(26.34 ± 4.46)分,离婚和丧偶者得分最低,分别为(25.29 ± 5.15)和(25.39 ± 5.72)分,城市居民精神健康得分(27.10 ± 4.08)分,高于乡村居民的(26.41 ± 4.25)分。 结论 辽宁省居民婚姻现状稳定性存在一定风险,目前需要着重处理离婚率过高问题;不良婚姻经历对精神健康的影响具有明显的负作用,在 ≥ 40岁年龄段,有配偶者的精神健康状况优于无配偶者。 Abstract:Objective To analyze mental health status among the residents with different marital status in Liaoning province. Methods The data for 2 905 adult residents in Liaoning province were extracted from the dataset of China Family Panel Study (CFPS) conducted in 2010 using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Mental health status and its correlation with marital condition among the residents were analyzed. Results Of the residents surveyed, 2.99% were devoiced and the ratio was higher than that of the national average. The mental health score differed significantly by gender, residential area, and age among the residents with different marital status. For the residents, the mental health score was higher among the males (27.05 ± 3.85) than among the females (26.34 ± 4.46), lower among the divorced (25.29 ± 5.15) or the widowed (25.39 ± 5.72) than among those with other marital status, and higher among the urban inhabitants (27.10 ± 4.08) than among rural inhabitants (26.41 ± 4.25). Conclusion Marriage stability is not good and high divorce rate needs to be concerned among the residents in Liaoning province. Bad marriage experience plays a negative role on mental health; among the residents aged 40 years and above, the married residents with a spouse have a better mental health than those without a spouse. -
Key words:
- marriage /
- mental health /
- influence factor
-
表 1 辽宁省不同特征居民精神健康得分比较
特征 精神健
康得分95 % CI F/t值 P值 婚姻现状 5.826 < 0.001 未婚 26.92 ± 3.30 26.54~27.29 在婚 26.79 ± 4.10 26.63~26.96 同居 26.85 ± 4.04 24.98~28.74 离婚 25.29 ± 5.15 24.19~26.38 丧偶 25.39 ± 5.72 24.53~26.25 性别 4.547 < 0.001 女性 26.34 ± 4.46 26.12~26.57 男性 27.05 ± 3.85 26.84~27.24 城乡 4.30 < 0.001 乡村 26.41 ± 4.25 26.22~26.61 城市 27.10 ± 4.08 26.86~27.34 年龄(岁) 5.00 < 0.001 16~29 27.06 ± 3.32 26.76~27.36 30~39 27.22 ± 3.39 26.91~27.53 40~49 26.39 ± 4.39 26.06~26.73 50~59 26.18 ± 4.68 25.82~26.54 60~69 26.77 ± 4.55 26.30~27.24 ≥ 70 26.87 ± 4.47 26.35~27.40 表 2 有无配偶居民精神健康得分比较
因素 类别 无配偶精神
健康得分有配偶精神
健康得分F/t值 P值 年龄(岁) 16~29 26.98 ± 3.21 27.16 ± 3.48 0.603 0.547 30~39 26.58 ± 3.95 27.27 ± 3.34 1.160 0.246 40~49 24.83 ± 5.73 26.51 ± 4.26 2.518 0.012 50~59 24.65 ± 5.98 26.34 ± 4.49 2.723 0.007 60~69 24.96 ± 6.00 27.03 ± 4.25 2.891 0.004 ≥ 70 26.05 ± 5.08 27.31 ± 4.04 2.273 0.024 性别 男性 26.40 ± 4.33 27.21 ± 3.71 3.116 0.002 女性 26.01 ± 4.47 26.42 ± 4.39 1.423 0.155 户籍 农村 25.97 ± 4.64 26.51 ± 4.16 2.051 0.040 城市 26.48 ± 4.41 27.27 ± 3.96 2.710 0.007 -
[1] 陆杰华, 王笑非. 20世纪90年代以来我国婚姻状况变化分析[J]. 北京社会科学, 2013, 11(3): 62 – 72. [2] Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. Stress and immunity: age enhances the risks[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2001(10): 18 – 21. [3] 谢宇, 胡婧炜, 张春泥. 中国家庭追踪调查: 理念与实践[J]. 社会, 2014, 8(2): 1 – 32. [4] 济南市65岁以上老年人精神健康状况影响因素研究[J]. 山东大学学报:医学版, 2011(1): 120 – 123. [5] 罗乐宣, 钟先阳, 王跃平, 等. 深圳特区不同婚姻状况人群的自测健康研究[J]. 实用预防医学, 2006, 13(04): 810 – 812. [6] 丁彦华. 父母婚姻质量与儿童心理发展的关系[J]. 中小学心理健康教育, 2014, 9(22): 4 – 6. [7] 孔海燕. 父母婚姻质量与子女心理健康关系的研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2016, 13(4): 48 – 52. [8] 王红, 梁渊, 左俊英, 等. 丧偶人群负性情绪及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2007, 4(11): 1373 – 1374. [9] 聂伟, 风笑天. 农民工的城市融入与精神健康——基于珠三角外来农民工的实证调查[J]. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2013, 7(5): 32 – 40. [10] 刘庆, 陈世海. 随迁老人精神健康状况及影响因素分析——基于深圳市的调查[J]. 中州学刊, 2015, 8(11): 73 – 77. [11] 马启民, 李喜泼, 张海燕, 等. 保定市精神障碍流行病学调查[J]. 中国全科医学, 2008, 11(3): 522 – 526. [12] 冯启明, 罗红叶, 韦波, 等. 广西壮族自治区城市社区居民抑郁症流行病学特征研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2012, 15(11A): 3660 – 3662.
点击查看大图
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1265
- HTML全文浏览量: 437
- PDF下载量: 65
- 被引次数: 0