高级检索
袁帆, 陈征, 张妍, 冯甘雨, 宫伟彦, 丁彩翠, 宋超, 刘爱玲. 我国职业人群身体活动现状调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(10): 1327-1330. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117983
引用本文: 袁帆, 陈征, 张妍, 冯甘雨, 宫伟彦, 丁彩翠, 宋超, 刘爱玲. 我国职业人群身体活动现状调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(10): 1327-1330. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117983
Fan YUAN, Zheng CHEN, Yan ZHANG, . Status of physical activity among occupational populations in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(10): 1327-1330. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117983
Citation: Fan YUAN, Zheng CHEN, Yan ZHANG, . Status of physical activity among occupational populations in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(10): 1327-1330. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117983

我国职业人群身体活动现状调查

Status of physical activity among occupational populations in China: a cross-sectional study

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解我国职业人群身体活动情况,为促进职业人群健康提供依据。
      方法  使用2010 — 2012年中国居民营养与健康状况调查数据,对我国31 694名职业人群(男性18 299名,女性13 395名)的职业活动、交通方式、闲暇锻炼、家务劳动等4项身体活动情况进行分析。
      结果  我国职业人群平均每周工作5.7 d,平均每天工作时间8.3 h,其中坐着工作时间为4.4 h,从事轻度工作强度的职业人群占63.0 %。平均出行时间为1.0 h/d,37.9 %的职业人群出行以步行/骑车为主。15.6 %的职业人群闲暇时间进行锻炼,从事家务劳动的职业人群占85.2 %,平均做家务时间为1.1 h。城市职业人群每天工作时间低于农村,但每天坐着工作时间、从事轻度工作强度的比例、闲暇锻炼的比例及做家务的比例均高于农村(P < 0.05)。男性工作时间、从事中度及以上工作强度的比例及坐/开车的比例均高于女性,而闲暇锻炼的比例及做家务的比例低于女性(P < 0.05)。与其他职业人群比较,农林牧渔业职业人群每天坐着工作时间最短、闲暇锻炼比例最低、从事中度及以上工作强度的比例最高(P < 0.05)。
      结论  不同职业人群的各类身体活动情况存在差异,应针对不同人群特点,开展针对性的健康教育和身体活动促进。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To describe the status of physical activity among Chinese occupational populations and to provide evidences for health promotion in the populations.
      Methods  The data were from China Nutrition and Health Survey, 2010 – 2012 and a total of 31 694 employees (18 299 males and 13 395 females) were involved in the study.The participants′ daily activities including occupation, traffic mode, leisure-time exercise, and housework were described.
      Results  The participants worked averagely 5.7 days per week, with 8.3 hours per day and about a half of the working hours (4.4) were involved in sitting position. There were 63.0% of the participants engaged in low-intensity work. For all the participants, the average daily commuting time was 1.0 hour, with 37.9% of the participants commuting mainly by walking/cycling. The proportion of the participants taking leisure-time exercise was 15.6% and that of being engaged in housework was 85.2%, with an average 1.1 hours of housework time per day. The urban participants reported a significantly less time of working per day but more time of working in sitting position and higher proportions of being engaged in low-intensity work, leisure-time exercise, and housework compared to the rural participants (all P < 0.05). The male participants reported more working hours, higher ratios of moderate-to-vigorous occupational physical activity and commuting by car but lower ratios of having leisure-time exercise and doing housework than the female participants, with significant differences (P < 0.05 for all). Among the participants, the lowest ratios of in sitting position while working and leisure-time exercise but the highest ratio of doing work of moderate-to-vigorous occupational physical activity were reported by those engaged in farming, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery work (all P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  There are significant differences in physical activity among Chinese occupation populations, suggesting that targeted health education and promotion programs should be conducted in various occupation populations.

     

/

返回文章
返回