高级检索
楚洁, 田雪莹, 姜莹莹, 张吉玉, 张丙银, 毛凡, 鹿子龙, 周脉耕, 郭晓雷. 山东省心血管疾病防控现状评价:基于中国心血管健康指数研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(6): 954-959. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128070
引用本文: 楚洁, 田雪莹, 姜莹莹, 张吉玉, 张丙银, 毛凡, 鹿子龙, 周脉耕, 郭晓雷. 山东省心血管疾病防控现状评价:基于中国心血管健康指数研究[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(6): 954-959. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128070
CHU Jie, TIAN Xue-ying, JIANG Ying-ying, . Status quo of prevention and control of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Shandong province: a Chinese′s cardiovascular health index-based evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(6): 954-959. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128070
Citation: CHU Jie, TIAN Xue-ying, JIANG Ying-ying, . Status quo of prevention and control of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Shandong province: a Chinese′s cardiovascular health index-based evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(6): 954-959. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128070

山东省心血管疾病防控现状评价:基于中国心血管健康指数研究

Status quo of prevention and control of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Shandong province: a Chinese′s cardiovascular health index-based evaluation

  • 摘要:
      目的  综合评价山东省人群心血管疾病流行现状及防治水平,发现问题与不足并提出改进建议,为今后全省心血管疾病防控工作指明重点方向。
      方法  采用文献综述和德尔菲咨询法建立中国心血管健康指数(CHI)综合指标体系,通过层次分析法确定各维度及指标的权重,从五个维度收集与心血管疾病相关的原始数据。经过同向趋势化、标准化和百分化等处理,获得各维度及总CHI得分。将山东省得分情况与全国及邻近省份进行比较。
      结果  山东省CHI得分52.9分,全国排名第8位,高于全国平均水平(49.4分)。五大维度中,山东省在C和E维度得分及排名较为靠前,为57.3分(第8名)和60.3分(第10名),但在A、B、D维度得分不理想(分别为53.9、50.9和38.1分),排名较为靠后(第14、20和20位)。二级指标层面,山东省在行为、成功戒烟率、卫生费用等指标排名相对靠前,但在早死概率、代谢性指标、PM2.5浓度、高血压防控、糖尿病防控、救治结局和居民健康素养等指标上得分低于全国水平。
      结论  山东省在危险因素防控、公共卫生政策与服务能力方面现阶段取得了一定成绩,但心血管疾病流行情况、危险因素暴露情况较为严峻,心血管疾病救治情况仍不理想,未来应进一步加强PM2.5浓度较高、体力活动不足等主要暴露因素及“三高”(高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症)病人的管理,控制人群超重/肥胖等代谢性指标异常水平,增加医疗救治资源配置,降低山东省心血管疾病流行水平。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To comprehensively evaluate the prevalence, prevention and management of cardio-cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in Shandong province for promoting effective CVD prevention and control in the province.
      Methods  A Chinese′s cardiovascular health index (CHI) system was established with literature review and Delphi consulting method. The weights of various dimensions and indexes of the system were determined with analytic hierarchy process and the original data on CVD were collected from five dimensions (namely A for disease prevalence, B for risk factor exposure, C for risk factor control, D for disease treatment, and E for public health policy and service). After homogenization, standardization, and percentaging, each dimension and total CHI score were finally obtained. Then the estimated CHI scores of Shandong province were compared with those of the whole country and its neighboring provinces.
      Results  The established CHI is composed of 52 indicators covering five dimensions, with a maximum score of 100. The estimated total CHI score for Shandong province was 52.9, ranking eighth among those for provincial level regions in the country and higher than the national average (49.4). The CHI dimension C and E score for Shandong province were 57.3 and 60.3 and the rank order of the two scores were the 8th and 10th among the scores for provincial level regions in the country from high to low; however, the rank order of CHI scores of dimension A (53.9), B (50.9) and D (38.1) were the 14th, 20th, and 20th, respectively, versus the scores of all other regions. Among the 52 indicators, the Shandong province′s scores for healthy behavior, successful smoking cessation rate, and health expense were higher than the national averages; but the scores for premature death probability, metabolic parameters, concentration of particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm in mean aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5), hypertension prevention and control, diabetes prevention and control, treatment outcomes, and residents′ health literacy were all lower than the averages.
      Conclusion   Based on the CHI evaluation on CVD prevention and control in Shandong province, the performance in risk factor prevention and control and construction of public health policy and service capability are good but the effectiveness for control of disease prevalence and risk factor exposure and for disease treatment need to be improved.

     

/

返回文章
返回