高级检索
程华, 钱序, 曹广华, 支玉红, 高燕宁, 姜庆五. 血站类型和献血方式对献血员感染HIV的影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2004, 20(9): 1061-1063.
引用本文: 程华, 钱序, 曹广华, 支玉红, 高燕宁, 姜庆五. 血站类型和献血方式对献血员感染HIV的影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2004, 20(9): 1061-1063.
CHENG Hua, QIAN Xu, CAO Guang-hua, . Impact of blood bank management and blood component on HIV infection among paid blood donors[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2004, 20(9): 1061-1063.
Citation: CHENG Hua, QIAN Xu, CAO Guang-hua, . Impact of blood bank management and blood component on HIV infection among paid blood donors[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2004, 20(9): 1061-1063.

血站类型和献血方式对献血员感染HIV的影响

Impact of blood bank management and blood component on HIV infection among paid blood donors

  • 摘要:
      目的   研究血站经营类型和献血方式等因素对有偿献血员感染HIV的影响。
      方法   根据WHO/UNAIDS推荐的HIV检测策略Ⅱ, 从2002年10月至2003年3月对中国中部某贫困县行政村全部有偿献血员进行HIV筛查和问卷调查。
      结果   参加筛查的有偿献血员共462人, 其中HIV筛查抗体阳性91人, 阳性率为19.70%(95%CI16.17%~23.62%); 献血员曾献过血的血站总共75家, 献全血和单采血浆次数在个体经营、本县、外县、地区以及部队经营血站间有显著性差异; 单因素分析显示, 在各种类型血站只献全血的献血员HIV阳性率为0, 去个体私营血站献血浆感染HIV的风险显著高于本县血站, 本县血站显著高于外县血站; 多因素Logistic分析显示, 只有到个体私营血站和本县血站献血浆是感染艾滋病病毒的危险因素, 调整OR值分别为2.72(95%CI1.95~3.79)和1.12(95%CI1.06~1.18);曾经到个体经营血站和本县血站的有偿献血员HIV筛查阳性率分别为72.73%和20.66%。
      结论   该村有偿献血员感染HIV的主要原因是去个体经营血站和本县血站献血浆; 卫生部门应确定"问题血站"并根据献血员在其献血情况来估计感染人数和确定重点干预地区。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To study the impact of blood bank management, blood component and other related factors on getting HIV infection among former paid blood donors in China.
      Methods   According to HIV testing strategy Ⅱ recommended by UN AIDS/WHO, all former paid blood donors of ZY village in the rural central China were asked to participate in HIV antibody screening and to finish questionnaire from October 2002 to March 2003.
      Results   91 out of 462 former paid blood donors were found HIV antibody positive, and the HIV prevalence was 19.70% with the confidence interval from 16.17% to 23.62%.The former blood donors had commercially donated either whole blood or plasma in 75 blood banks, which were grouped into following 5 categories according to management type: privacy-owned blood bank(PBB), local country-level government-owned blood bank(LCGBB), out country-level government-owned blood bank(OCGBB), district-level government-owned blood bank(DGBB)and military blood bank(MBB).The significant difference was found between different types of blood bank with regard to the frequency of donating either whole blood or plasma.Univariate analysis showed that no HIV infection was found among those who had commercially donated whole blood in all types of blood bank, the HIV prevalence among the donors who donated plasma only in PBB was significantly higher than that only in LCGBB, and the HIV prevalence only in LCGBB was significantly higher than that only in OCGBB.Non-conditional logistic regression showed that donating plasma either in PBBor in LCGBB was the risk factor for getting HIV infection, with adjusted OR value of 2.72 and 1.12 respectively.The HIV prevalence among those donating plasma in PBBand in LCGBB were 72.73% and 20.66% respectively.
      Conclusion   The risk factors of getting HIVinfection among commercially paid blood donors were plasma donation either in PBB or in LCGBB.Health authorities should find out these "problem blood banks", then identify the HIV-infected blood donors who donated plasma in "problem blood bank", which would benefit for estimating the number of HIV-infected donors and setting priority of intervention.

     

/

返回文章
返回