高级检索
梁万年, 刘民, 陈琦, 刘泽军, 贺雄, 潘越, 谢学勤. SARS患者发病及病例报告时间干预效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2004, 20(2): 129-130.
引用本文: 梁万年, 刘民, 陈琦, 刘泽军, 贺雄, 潘越, 谢学勤. SARS患者发病及病例报告时间干预效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2004, 20(2): 129-130.
LIANG Wan-nian, LIU Min, CHEN Qi, . Description about onset date, visit date, report date of severe acute respiratory syndromes(SARS) to observe impact of public health interventions[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2004, 20(2): 129-130.
Citation: LIANG Wan-nian, LIU Min, CHEN Qi, . Description about onset date, visit date, report date of severe acute respiratory syndromes(SARS) to observe impact of public health interventions[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2004, 20(2): 129-130.

SARS患者发病及病例报告时间干预效果分析

Description about onset date, visit date, report date of severe acute respiratory syndromes(SARS) to observe impact of public health interventions

  • 摘要:
      目的   分析北京市SARS患者发病、住院和病例报告时间及其间隔天数, 评价传染性非典型肺炎流行期间公共卫生干预措施的影响与效果.
      方法   对北京市传染病非典型肺炎疫情报告卡数据库中有关变量, 采用描述性流行病学方法进行分析.
      结果   在北京市SARS流行早期, 病人就诊间隔天数与报告间隔天数均不规律; 4月中旬后, 平均报告间隔天数开始下降; 患者就诊及疫情上报的混乱状况得到了有效控制.
      结论   北京市的SARS公共卫生干预措施起到了积极作用, 疫情控制信息系统的敏感性与及时性在流行中后期明显提高, 对有效控制疫情效果良好.

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To analyze the situation of onset date, visit date, report date and their interval of SARS patients in Beijing, and evaluate the impact of public health intervention.
      Methods   Data of SARS cases notified from Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention(BCDC)were collected.The data were analyzed by descriptive epidemiology.
      Results   In the early epidemic period, it was not regular of the interval to visit and reported.After the middle ten days of April, the intervals turned more regular, and the confusion of the visit and report was controlled.
      Conclusion   The public health intervention of SARS rose positive effect.

     

/

返回文章
返回