高级检索
潘建平, 杨子尼, 任旭红, 王桂香, 王惠珊, 席卫平, 马葆靖, 石淑华, 弋花妮, 傅平, 古桂雄, 静进, 俞红, 李琼昭, 李威, 喻贵清, 马西, 吴娅莉, 黎海芪. 中国3~6岁城区儿童忽视常模的研制[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2003, 19(1): 33-36.
引用本文: 潘建平, 杨子尼, 任旭红, 王桂香, 王惠珊, 席卫平, 马葆靖, 石淑华, 弋花妮, 傅平, 古桂雄, 静进, 俞红, 李琼昭, 李威, 喻贵清, 马西, 吴娅莉, 黎海芪. 中国3~6岁城区儿童忽视常模的研制[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2003, 19(1): 33-36.
PAN Jian-ping, YANG Zi-ni, REN Xu-hong, . Development of child neglect norms of urban children aged 3-6 years in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2003, 19(1): 33-36.
Citation: PAN Jian-ping, YANG Zi-ni, REN Xu-hong, . Development of child neglect norms of urban children aged 3-6 years in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2003, 19(1): 33-36.

中国3~6岁城区儿童忽视常模的研制

Development of child neglect norms of urban children aged 3-6 years in China

  • 摘要:
      目的   研究制定评价儿童忽视的工具和标准; 同时为父母及保教人员科学养育孩子提供行为指南。
      方法   (1) 在全国7个行政大区25个代表性城市2~6岁儿童中随机抽取有效样本1457例, 男女各半, 少数民族占49%.(2)儿童忽视问卷由6个层面的146个题项组成.(3)对所收集的数据, 经题项难易度分析、项目分析、因素分析和内部一致性检验, 逐步删除不适宜题项、层面和年龄组; 经信度分析、效度分析, 从而形成正式量表; 再确定相应的参数, 最终完成常模的研制。
      结果   (1) 一般特征: 男童与女童量表忽视总分比较无显着性差异; 男、女童在6个忽视层面得分均值比较也均无显着性差异。(2)量表的形成: 经过项目分析、因素分析及内部一致性检验, 逐步删除53个不适宜题项及1个层面, 最终形成由5个层面91个题项组成的总量表; 再经信度分析(总量表及各忽视层面的内部一致性系数α、分半信度, 重测信度, 平行信度等)和效度分析(结构效度、外部效度、表面效度等), 结果均较理想, 达到了常模的要求。(3)忽视界值点的确定: 总量表及每一忽视层面得分的第90百。分位数(P90)分别是: 身体忽视层面35分、情感忽视层面80分、教育忽视层面40分、医疗忽视层面15分、安全忽视层面20分; 总忽视界值点点190分。
      结论   本忽视常模由5个层面91个题项组成, 可分别评价儿童在身体、情感、教育、医疗、安全方面所受到的忽视及其程度, 也可用来衡量父母及有关人员在看护孩子时的行为和态度。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To develop the Child Neglect Norms(CNN)of urban children aged 3-6 years and provide a measure tool and evaluation criterion for carrying out study, investigation and prevention on child neglect in China.
      Methods   (1) 1 457 children(726 males(49.8%))were randomly sampled from 5 cities, which were representatives of 7 administrative regions of China in accordance with sex, age.The minority nationality's proportion was 4.9%.(2)The questionnaire was composed of 146 items of 6 subscales.The data were collected by trained professional staff.(3)Data were analysed by item's distinguishing power analysis, factor analysis, internal consistency analysis to delete unsuitable items, subscales and age groups; by reliability analysis(Cronbach's alphas, Split-half reliability, the test-reliability, parallel reliability)and validity analysis(construction validity, face validity and exterior validity)to formal scales and then determine corresponding parameters to finish final norms.
      Results   (1) General characteristic: ①CNN scores(x±s)for the male children was not significantly different form that for female children.②There was no significant difference between male and female children for each of the 6 neglect subscales.(2)Developing scales: The overall scale was developed by item's distinguishing power analysis, factor analysis and iternal consistency analysis in which 53 items and 1 subscale(the social neglect subscale)were removed from the initial questionnaire.The final CNN scale contained 91 items of 5 neglect subscales.Reliability analysis(coefficient of Internal consistency, Split-half reliability, Test-retest reliability and parallel reliability of the overall CNN and all neglect subscale)and Validity analysis(The construction Validity, Cronbach's alphas, Face Vialidity and Exterior Validity)were perfect.(3)Cut-off Point of the CNN: Percentile 90(P90)of the score on each neglect subscale and the overall scale were respectively; physical neglect subscale 35, emotion 80, education 40, safety 20 and medicine 15, the overall scale 190.
      Conclusion   The CNN which consisted of 91 items of 5 scales may evaluate physical, emotional, educational, medical and safe neglect situation for children respectively.It may also be useful in assessing parent's and child-caregiver's behaviors and attitude.

     

/

返回文章
返回