高级检索
钱中夏, 马玉香, 张广业, 高生兰. 白喉毒素抗体水平测定的三种方法比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 1986, 5(2): 37-39.
引用本文: 钱中夏, 马玉香, 张广业, 高生兰. 白喉毒素抗体水平测定的三种方法比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 1986, 5(2): 37-39.
shu
Qian Zhongxia, Ma yuxiang, Zhang guangye, Gao shenglan. Comparison of Three Methods for Measurement of Diphtheria Antitoxin Level[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 1986, 5(2): 37-39.
Citation: Qian Zhongxia, Ma yuxiang, Zhang guangye, Gao shenglan. Comparison of Three Methods for Measurement of Diphtheria Antitoxin Level[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 1986, 5(2): 37-39.
shu

白喉毒素抗体水平测定的三种方法比较

Comparison of Three Methods for Measurement of Diphtheria Antitoxin Level

    摘要
  • 摘要: 人群白喉毒素抗体水平测定，一直沿用锡克氏试验，此法简便可靠，但不能测出两组人群抗体水平量的差别。近年来有了微量间接血凝试验，建立了白喉抗体水平定量工作。

     

    Abstract: Measurements of diphtheia antitoxin level in 825 human serum specimens by Schick test(ST),indirect microraemagglutination test (IHA) and enzyme Linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were compared. The level of antitoxia used for differentiating positive and negative results was 0.0lu/ml. 1t was showed that the positive rates obtained with ST, IHA aad ELISA were 59.7%(493/825), 15%(125/823) and 58% (471/808) respectively.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(0)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回