高级检索
安思琪, 陈长香, 李建民, 张敏, 李淑杏, 窦娜. 高龄失能老年人人生态度和人格型态与衰弱程度相关性[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 17-22. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114801
引用本文: 安思琪, 陈长香, 李建民, 张敏, 李淑杏, 窦娜. 高龄失能老年人人生态度和人格型态与衰弱程度相关性[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 17-22. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114801
Si-qi AN, Chang-xiang CHEN, Jian-min LI, . Associations of life attitude and personality type with degree of frailty in disabled oldest-old people[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 17-22. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114801
Citation: Si-qi AN, Chang-xiang CHEN, Jian-min LI, . Associations of life attitude and personality type with degree of frailty in disabled oldest-old people[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 17-22. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114801

高龄失能老年人人生态度和人格型态与衰弱程度相关性

Associations of life attitude and personality type with degree of frailty in disabled oldest-old people

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解高龄失能老年人衰弱程度,探究不同人生态度和人格型态对衰弱的影响。
      方法  于2016年7月 —2017年1月采用分层随机整群抽样方法选取河北省唐山市10个社区卫生服务中心≥ 75岁高龄失能老年人进行The CFAI衰弱综合评估。
      结果  1 664名高龄失能老年人衰弱率为100 %(1 664/1 664),其中轻度衰弱占15.81 %(263/1 664),中度衰弱占32.99 %(549/1 664),重度衰弱占51.20 %(852/1 664);多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,外向型性格(OR = 0.655)、不能积极面对生活(OR = 2.440)、主观幸福感很不幸福(OR = 21.025)、倾诉(OR =0.477)、参与社区活动频率为不参加(OR = 2.547)、没感觉生活充实(OR = 0.183)、没感觉厌烦(OR = 0.554)、与他人关系不和谐(OR = 1.585)、没感觉情绪低落(OR = 0.457)、一直寂寞(OR = 4.130)、一直被人冷落(OR = 2.986)是高龄失能老年人衰弱的影响因素,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。
      结论  不同人生态度和人格类型的高龄失能老年人衰弱程度不同,应加强人类全生命周期教育,树立积极乐观的人生观和世界观,建立积极的人格型态,延缓高龄失能老人的衰弱进程,实现健康老龄化。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine the status of frailty and to explore impacts of life attitude and personality pattern on frailty among disabled oldest-old people.
      Methods  We recruited 1 664 disabled oldest-old residents aged ≥ 75 years with stratified random cluster sampling from communities covered by 10 community health care centers in Tangshan city and then conducted a household survey among the participants between July 2016 and January 2017 with a self-designed general questionnaire, Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
      Results  Among all the participants, the prevalence rate of frailty was 100 %, with the prevalence rates of 15.81 % (263/1 664), 32.99 % (549/1 664), and 51.20 % (852/1 664) for mild, moderate, and severe frailty. Logistic regression analyses revealed following significant impact factors of frailty among the participants: extrovert personality (odds ratio OR = 0.655), attitude towards life (without positive attitude towards life: OR = 2.440, without perceived happiness in life at all: OR = 21.025, confiding in others frequently: OR = 0.477, not participating in community activities: OR = 2.547), and personality type (no perceived life enrichment: OR = 0.183, no perceived boredom: OR = 0.554, having no harmonious relationship with others: OR = 1.585, no perceived depression: OR = 0.457, feeling lonely at all the time: OR = 4.130, with perceived neglect at all the time: OR = 2.986) (P < 0.05 for all).
      Conclusion  Frailty condition differs by attitude towards life and personality type among disabled oldest-old people and education on human life cycle should be promoted to retard frailty progress among the population.

     

/

返回文章
返回