高级检索
陈长香, 安思琪, 郝习君, 李建民. 高龄老人日常生活和精神照顾需求支持体系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 1-6. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114802
引用本文: 陈长香, 安思琪, 郝习君, 李建民. 高龄老人日常生活和精神照顾需求支持体系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 1-6. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114802
Chang-xiang CHEN, Si-qi AN, Xi-jun HAO, . Demands and support system for daily life and mental care among oldest-old people in Tangshan city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 1-6. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114802
Citation: Chang-xiang CHEN, Si-qi AN, Xi-jun HAO, . Demands and support system for daily life and mental care among oldest-old people in Tangshan city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 1-6. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114802

高龄老人日常生活和精神照顾需求支持体系

Demands and support system for daily life and mental care among oldest-old people in Tangshan city

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解高龄老人的衰弱进程中日常生活、精神照护需求状况及其家庭、社区、社会因素,为采取支持性应对措施提供依据。
      方法  于2016年7月 — 2017年1月采用分层随机整群抽样方法选取河北省唐山市2家医院的10个社区卫生服务中心辖区内≥ 75岁老年人,采用The CFAI衰弱综合评估工具、日常活动能力量表(ADL)以及孤独量表(UCLA)进行评测。
      结果  3 448名高龄老人衰弱率为100 %;非常需要生活照顾者占23.32 %(804/3 448),非常需要精神照护者占68.94 %(2 377/3 448),两者最需要提供的照护者均为子女和老伴。多因素分析显示,衰弱程度、年龄及兄弟姐妹、邻里、子女、老伴、志愿者、其他家庭成员等提供帮助是居家高龄老人生活照顾需求的影响因素(t值分别为21.876、11.673、2.676、3.871、3.812、– 2.806、– 2.735、– 2.573),差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);衰弱程度、邻里提供帮助、子女提供帮助、老伴提供帮助、文化程度、居委会提供帮助、兄弟姐妹提供帮助是居家高龄老人精神照顾需求的影响因素(t值分别为26.572、13.060、– 6.995、– 4.607、– 3.057、2.729、– 2.165),差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。
      结论  家庭成员、社区、社会支持是高龄老人日常生活及精神照护的基础,应加强支持体系的构建,提高整体照护水平,提高老年人生命质量。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine the need and related family, community and society factors of frailty-related daily life and mental care among oldest-old people and to provide evidences for taking supportive measures.
      Methods  We recruited 3 448 home-living residents aged ≥ 75 years with stratified random cluster sampling from communities covered by 10 community health care centers in Tangshan city; then we conducted a household questionnaire survey among the participants between July 2016 and January 2017 with Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale.
      Results  Various degrees of frailty were identified among all the participants; 23.32 % (804/3 448) and 68.9 % (2 377/3 448) of the participants reported strong demands for daily life care and spiritual comfort and most of the demanders considered children and spouse as the providers for the two types of care. Multivariate analyses showed that significant impact factors for daily life care included frailty degree (t = 21.876), age (t = 11.673), and helps from siblings (t = 2.676), neighbours (t = 3.871), children (3.812), spouse (t = – 2.806), volunteers (t = – 2.735) and other family members(t = – 2.573) among the home-living oldest-old people (P < 0.05 for all); while those for spiritual comfort were frailty degree (26.572) and helps from neighbours (t = 13.060), children (t = – 6.995), spouse (t = – 4.607), neighborhood committee (t = 2.729), siblings (t = – 2.165), and education level (t = – 3.057) (all P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Family function, community and social support are the basis of daily life and mental care for oldest-old people; we should strengthen the construction of support system and improve the level of overall care for the oldest-old people.

     

/

返回文章
返回