高级检索
陈长香, 安思琪, 郝习君, 张敏. 唐山市居家 ≥ 75岁高龄老年人经济和安全照顾需求支持体系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 186-190. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114803
引用本文: 陈长香, 安思琪, 郝习君, 张敏. 唐山市居家 ≥ 75岁高龄老年人经济和安全照顾需求支持体系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 186-190. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114803
Chang-xiang CHEN, Si-qi AN, Xi-jun HAO, . Demands and support system for economic and safety care among home-living oldest-old people in Tangshan city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 186-190. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114803
Citation: Chang-xiang CHEN, Si-qi AN, Xi-jun HAO, . Demands and support system for economic and safety care among home-living oldest-old people in Tangshan city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 186-190. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114803

唐山市居家 ≥ 75岁高龄老年人经济和安全照顾需求支持体系

Demands and support system for economic and safety care among home-living oldest-old people in Tangshan city

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解居家高龄老人的经济、安全照护需求状况及其家庭、社区、社会因素,为采取支持性应对措施提供依据。
      方法  于2016年7月 — 2017年1月采用分层随机整群抽样方法选取河北省唐山市2家医院的10个社区卫生服务中心注册居家≥ 75岁老年人为研究对象,进行跌倒危险及经济来源量表评测。
      结果  3 448名高龄老人中,非常需要经济照顾者占13.92 %(480/3 448),非常需要安全照护者占25.93 %(894/3 448),两者最需要提供的照护者均为子女。多因素分析显示,年龄、子女提供帮助、居委会提供帮助、兄弟姐妹提供帮助、志愿者提供帮助是居家高龄老人经济照顾需求的影响因素(t值分别为– 4.165、3.141、– 3.560、6.455、– 3.076),差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.01);年龄、邻里提供帮助、老伴提供帮助、子女提供帮助、兄弟姐妹提供帮助、其他成员提供帮助是居家高龄老人安全照顾需求的影响因素(t值分别为10.012、7.636、– 5.109、– 3.587、1.996、– 2.112),差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。
      结论  家庭成员、社区、社会支持是高龄老人经济及安全照护的有力保障,应增强个人能力,完善支持体系的构建,提高整体照护水平,提高老人生命质量。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine the need and related family,community and society factors of economic and safety care among home-living oldest-old people and to provide evidences for taking supportive measures.
      Methods  We recruited 3 448 home-living residents aged ≥ 75 years with stratified random cluster sampling from communities covered by 10 community health care centers in Tangshan city; then we conducted a household questionnaire survey on falling risk and economic status among the participants between July 2016 and January 2017 with Modified Falls Risk for Older People in the Community Assessment (FROP-Com) and the Economic Support Scale.
      Results  Of all the participants, 13.92 % (480/3 448) and 25.93 % (894/3 448) reported high demand for economic and safety care and most of the demanders considered their children as the providers for the two types of care. Multivariate analyses showed that significant impact factors for economic care included helps from children (t = 3.141), neighborhood committee (t = – 3.560), siblings (t = 6.455), and volunteers (t = – 3.076) and age (t = – 4.165) (P < 0.05 for all); while those for safety care were age (t = 10.012) and helps from neighborhood (t = 7.636), spouse (t = – 5.109), children (t = – 3.587), brothers and sisters (t = 1.996), and other family members (t = – 2.112), respectively (all P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Family members,community and social support are the strong guarantees for economic and security care for the oldest-old people. We should enhance the ability of individuals,perfect the construction of support system and promote the overall level of cares for improving life quality of the population.

     

/

返回文章
返回