高级检索
杨小娇, 汪凤兰, 张小丽, 邢凤梅. 家庭关怀度和社会支持对老年人健康促进行为影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(9): 1266-1269. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114857
引用本文: 杨小娇, 汪凤兰, 张小丽, 邢凤梅. 家庭关怀度和社会支持对老年人健康促进行为影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(9): 1266-1269. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114857
Xiao-jiao YANG, Feng-lan WANG, Xiao-li ZHANG, . Impact of family care and social support on health promotion behavior among older residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(9): 1266-1269. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114857
Citation: Xiao-jiao YANG, Feng-lan WANG, Xiao-li ZHANG, . Impact of family care and social support on health promotion behavior among older residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(9): 1266-1269. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1114857

家庭关怀度和社会支持对老年人健康促进行为影响

Impact of family care and social support on health promotion behavior among older residents

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨家庭关怀度与社会支持对老年人健康促进行为的影响。
      方法  于2016年10月采用整群抽样法, 对河北省邯郸市1 455名≥60岁老人应用家庭关怀度指数量表(APGAR)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)、健康促进生活方式评定量表–Ⅱ(HPLP-Ⅱ)及自编的一般情况问卷进行入户调查。
      结果  与低家庭关怀组相比,高家庭关怀组的老年人健康促进总分及各维度得分较高(P < 0.05)。社会支持满意组的老年人健康促进行为得分较高(P < 0.05)。家庭关怀度和社会支持与老年健康促进行为呈正相关(r = 0.531,P < 0.05)。多元逐步回归分析结果,婚姻状况(β ′ = 4.458,β = 0.096)、月收入(β ′ = – 1.728,β = – 0.080)、家庭结构(β ′ = 2.463,β = 0.072)、慢性病(β ′ = – 4.188,β = – 0.200)、长期用药(β ′ = 3.572,β = 0.085)、家庭关怀度(β ′ = 2.344,β = 0.164)、社会支持(β ′ = 1.263,β = 0.528)是健康促进行为的影响因素,可解释健康促进行为47.4 %的变异量。
      结论  家庭关怀度和社会支持影响老年人的健康促进行为。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the impact of family care and social support on health promotion behaviors among elder residents.
      Methods  A total of 1 455 community residents aged 60 years and over were recruited with random cluster sampling in Handan municipality of Hebei province; then we conducted a household survey among the elderly using a general questionnaire, Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection and Resolve (APGAR) Scale, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-Ⅱ (HPLP-Ⅱ) during October 2016.
      Results  The overall and domain scores of HPLP-Ⅱ were higher among the elderly with high family care than among those with low family care (P < 0.05). The health promotion behavior score was higher among the elderly perceiving good social support than among those perceiving general or poor social support (P < 0.05). The health promotion behavior was positively correlated with the overall score of family care and social support (r = 0.531, P < 0.05). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed influencing factors of health promotion behavior in the elderly as following: marital status (regression coefficient β ′ = 4.458, standard regression coefficient β = 0.096), monthly income (β ′ = – 1.728, β = – 0.080), family structure (β ′ = 2.463, β = 0.072), with chronic disease (β ′ = – 4.188, β = – 0.200), having long-term medication (β ′ = 3.572, β = 0.085), family care (β ′ = 2.344, β = 0.164), and social support (β ′ = 1.263, β = 0.528); all the influencing factors contributed to 47.4 % of the total variation in health promotion behavior.
      Conclusion  Family care and social support influence health promotion behaviors among community elderly.

     

/

返回文章
返回