高级检索
于倩倩, 尹文强, 黄冬梅, 孙葵, 陈钟鸣, 唐昌海. 山东省乡村医生组织公平感对其离职倾向、工作绩效影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(5): 724-728. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115957
引用本文: 于倩倩, 尹文强, 黄冬梅, 孙葵, 陈钟鸣, 唐昌海. 山东省乡村医生组织公平感对其离职倾向、工作绩效影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(5): 724-728. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115957
Qian-qian YU, Wen-qiang YIN, Dong-mei HUANG, . Effects of organizational justice on turnover intention, work performance among village doctors in Shandong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(5): 724-728. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115957
Citation: Qian-qian YU, Wen-qiang YIN, Dong-mei HUANG, . Effects of organizational justice on turnover intention, work performance among village doctors in Shandong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(5): 724-728. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1115957

山东省乡村医生组织公平感对其离职倾向、工作绩效影响

Effects of organizational justice on turnover intention, work performance among village doctors in Shandong province

  • 摘要:
      目的  测量乡村医生组织公平感、离职倾向及工作绩效现状,分析组织公平感对其离职倾向、工作绩效的影响。
      方法  2015年10 — 11月,采用多阶段分层随机抽样方法抽取山东省6个市的1 018名乡村医生进行问卷调查,采用描述统计、因子分析以及结构方程等方法分析资料、验证假设。
      结果  组织公平感包括分配公平和程序公平2个维度,工作绩效包括任务绩效、人际促进和工作奉献3个维度。分配公平和程序公平分别对离职倾向产生直接负向影响(– 0.214和– 0.189),分配公平间接正向影响任务绩效、人际促进和工作奉献(0.030,0.028和0.031);程序公平对任务绩效的总效应0.162(直接效应0.136,间接效应0.026),对人际促进的总效应是0.227(直接效应0.202,间接效应0.025),对工作奉献的间接效应0.028。
      结论  分配公平和程序公平均显著的直接正向影响离职倾向,程序公平显著的直接正向影响工作绩效,分配公平通过离职倾向中介变量正向影响工作绩效。建议提高乡村医生的分配公平感和程序公平感以降低其离职倾向,提高程序公平感以提高其工作绩效。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To assess the status of organizational justice, turnover intention and work performance among village doctors, and to analyze the effects of organizational justice on turnover intention and work performance.
      Methods  A total of 1 018 village doctors in 6 cities of Shandong province were surveyed from October to November 2015. Descriptive method and factor analysis were used in data analyses and structural equation model was adopted to verify the hypothesis.
      Results  The organizational justice includes two dimensions: distributive and procedural justice and work performance includes three dimensions: task performance, interpersonal promotion, and work dedication. Distributive and procedural justice exerted a negative impact directly on turnover intention (influence coefficient: – 0.214 and – 0.189); distributive justice exerted a positive impact indirectly on task performance, interpersonal promotion and work dedication (influence coefficient: 0.030, 0.028 and 0.031). The total effect of procedural justice is 0.162 (0.136 and 0.026 for direct and indirect effect) on task performance and 0.227 (0.202 and 0.025 for direct and indirect effect) on interpersonal promotion; the indirect effect of procedural justice is 0.028 on work dedication.
      Conclusion  The study demonstrates that distributive justice and procedural justice have significant direct positive effect on turnover intention; the procedural justice has a direct positive impact on work performance; the distribution justice has a positive impact on work performance through turnover intention as a mediating variable. The results suggest that improving organizational justice and procedural justice could reduce turnover intention and improve work performance among rural doctors.

     

/

返回文章
返回