高级检索
沈洁, 高丽丽, 张月, 韩历丽, 简伟研, 李鹏. 北京35~64岁妇女不同模式免费宫颈癌筛查结果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(7): 942-945. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116938
引用本文: 沈洁, 高丽丽, 张月, 韩历丽, 简伟研, 李鹏. 北京35~64岁妇女不同模式免费宫颈癌筛查结果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(7): 942-945. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116938
Jie SHEN, Li-li GAO, Yue ZHANG, . Screening results of different free cervical cancer screening strategies among 35- to 64-year-old women in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(7): 942-945. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116938
Citation: Jie SHEN, Li-li GAO, Yue ZHANG, . Screening results of different free cervical cancer screening strategies among 35- to 64-year-old women in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(7): 942-945. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1116938

北京35~64岁妇女不同模式免费宫颈癌筛查结果分析

Screening results of different free cervical cancer screening strategies among 35- to 64-year-old women in Beijing

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析采用不同模式对北京市适龄妇女进行宫颈癌免费筛查结果。
      方法  在2014年12月 — 2015年3月北京市接受宫颈癌免费筛查的182 119例35~64岁妇女中,采用整群随机抽样法,分别采用联合筛查、高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)初筛以及细胞学初筛方法筛查宫颈癌,使用SPSS 11.0软件对数据进行描述性分析和 χ2检验。
      结果  在35~64岁妇女中进行的免费宫颈癌筛查结果显示,联合筛查癌及癌前病变检出率最高,为505.9/10万,高于HPV初筛的334.6/10万及细胞学初筛的246.3/10万,不同模式宫颈癌检出率和早诊率差异无统计学意义。联合筛查的初筛阳性率为8.5 %,显著高于HPV初筛及细胞学初筛。高危型HPV检出阳性率为7.4 %,其中HPV16型检出率为0.53 %,HPV18型检出率为0.15 %。
      结论  初筛手段中增加HPV检测具有可行性。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze screening results of different free cervical cancer screening strategies among 35- to 64-year-old women in Beijing.
      Methods  Cervical cytology, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test, and co-testing (combining the two detections) were adopted for cervical cancer screening free of charge among 182 119 women aged 35 – 64 years selected with random cluster sampling in 9 urban and rural districts of Beijing city from December 2014 to March 2015. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 11.0.
      Results  The overall detection rate (505.9/100 000) of cervical cancer and precancerous lesion of co-testing screening was significantly higher than that of cervical cytology (334.6/100 000) and HR-HPV test (246.3/100 000) (P < 0.001); but there were no significant differences in detection rate and early detection rate of cervical cancer among the participants taking different screening schemes. The positive rate of HR-HPV or abnormal cervical cytology co-testing was 8.5%, which was significantly higher than that for preliminary HR-HPV and cervical cytology screening. Among all the participants, the detection rate of HR-HPV was 7.4%, with the detection rate of 0.53% for human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) and 0.15% for HPV-18.
      Conclusion  The study demonstrates that adopting HR-HPV test is applicable in preliminary cervical cancer screening.

     

/

返回文章
返回