高级检索
晋菲斐, 田向阳. 不同健康传播方式对中国居民传染病健康素养影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(8): 1125-1128. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117199
引用本文: 晋菲斐, 田向阳. 不同健康传播方式对中国居民传染病健康素养影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(8): 1125-1128. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117199
Fei-fei JIN, Xiang-yang TIAN. Effect of different health communication method on infectious disease-specific health literacy among Chinese residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(8): 1125-1128. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117199
Citation: Fei-fei JIN, Xiang-yang TIAN. Effect of different health communication method on infectious disease-specific health literacy among Chinese residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(8): 1125-1128. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1117199

不同健康传播方式对中国居民传染病健康素养影响

Effect of different health communication method on infectious disease-specific health literacy among Chinese residents

  • 摘要:
      目的  研究不同健康传播方式对中国不同人群传染病健康素养的影响,探寻不同人群的有效干预模式。
      方法  于2015年5 — 7月,随机抽取中国东中西部浙江、湖北和甘肃3省的城市社区居民等六类人群,每类人群分5组,每组50人,分别采取1种健康传播方式进行现场干预,干预前后使用中国居民传染病健康素养测评量表(IDSHL)对干预对象进行测评,通过得分的变化评价干预效果。
      结果  本研究共干预4 292人。群体传播、新媒体传播、阅读宣传折页手册和观看科普视频4种方式对工地工人的干预效果最好,其传染病健康素养得分比干预前分别提高了107.88 %、38.03 %、46.43 %和104.22 %。人际传播对农村社区居民的干预效果最好,素养得分提高44.01 %。针对城市社区居民,群体、新媒体和人际传播优于视频;针对城市中学学生,群体、新媒体和宣传折页优于视频;针对宾馆服务员,群体优于其他传播方式;针对工地工人,群体和视频优于其他传播方式;针对农村社区居民,人际优于其他传播方式;针对农村中学学生,人际与新媒体优于其他传播方式。
      结论  开展健康传播可显著提高不同人群的传染病健康素养,新媒体传播适合大部分人群,城市人群更适合健康知识讲座,农村人群更适合采用小组讨论学习等面对面的人际健康传播方式。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the influence of different health communication method on infectious disease-specific health literacy and effective intervention mode in various populations in China.
      Methods  We randomly selected people of 6 population types (urban and rural community residents, urban and rural middle school students, hotel attendants, and construction workers) in districts and counties in Zhejiang, Hubei, and Gansu province between May and July 2015; then we assigned the people of each population type into 5 groups (50 in each group) undertaking an intervention on health literacy via various communication methods, respectively. We conducted questionnaire surveys on infectious disease-specific health literacy before and after the intervention using Infectious Disease-Specific Health Literacy Scale (IDSHL).
      Results  Totally 4 292 people completed the intervention and the surveys. Better effects of interventions via group communication, social media communication, reading pamphlet, and watching video were observed among the construction workers, with the percentages for increment in IDSHL score of 107.88%, 38.03%, 46.43%, and 104.22% after the intervention, respectively. For rural community residents, the effect of the intervention via interpersonal communication was the best, with a 44.01% increase in IDSHL score. The effect of intervention via group communication, social media communication and interpersonal communication was better than that via watching video for urban community residents; the effect of intervention via group communication, social media communication, and reading pamphlet was better than that of watching video for urban middle school students; the effect of intervention via group communication was better than that of other communication methods for hotel attendants; the effect of intervention via group communication and watching videos was better for construction workers; and the effect of intervention via interpersonal communication and new media communication was better for rural middle school students.
      Conclusion  Health communication can significantly improve the level of infectious disease-specific health literacy among various Chinese populations. Social media communication is generally applicable in various populations; while, group communication is more suitable for urban populations and interpersonal communication is suitable for rural populations.

     

/

返回文章
返回