高级检索
王超男, 廖凯举, 李冰, 吴洪涛, 许真. 中国卫生应急管理体系建设调查分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118023
引用本文: 王超男, 廖凯举, 李冰, 吴洪涛, 许真. 中国卫生应急管理体系建设调查分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118023
Chao-nan WANG, Kai-ju LIAO, Bing LI, . Development of public health emergency response framework in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118023
Citation: Chao-nan WANG, Kai-ju LIAO, Bing LI, . Development of public health emergency response framework in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118023

中国卫生应急管理体系建设调查分析

Development of public health emergency response framework in China: a cross-sectional study

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解当前省、市和县三级以“一案三制”为主的卫生应急管理体系建设情况,为加强中国卫生应急管理体系建设提供依据。
      方法  于2013年采用横断面调查方法,对全国省、市和县级卫生应急管理体系建设中的政策保障、预案制定、法制建设、机制建设和指挥决策系统进行调查。
      结果  省、市和县卫生应急管理体系建设均值百分比分别为83.1 %、72.0 %和65.8 %;省级东部、中部和西部分别为84.8 %、84.8 %和80.1 %,市级为77.1 %、73.0 %和66.9 %,县级为68.6 %、65.4 %和60.5 %。
      结论  中国各省、市、县级各医疗卫生机构卫生应急管理体系建设总体提高的同时仍存在较大的行政级别差异和区域差异,基层和西部地区仍将是重点。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To describe current situation of the development of public health emergency response framework at provincial, municipal and county level in China and to provide evidences for promoting the development of the framework.
      Methods  A questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2013 to collect the information on the development of public health emergency response framework (policy, preparedness planning, legislation, organizational structure, mechanism and decision making system) in health related facilities at provincial, municipal, and county levels in China.
      Results  The average scoring percentage in the evaluation on overall development of health emergency response framework was 83.1 %, 72.0 %, and 65.8 % for health related facilities at provincial, municipal, and county level; the average scoring percentages for evaluating the overall development in eastern, central, and western region of China were as following: 84.8 %, 84.8 %, and 80.1 % for the health related facilities at provincial level; 77.1 %, 73.0 %, and 66.9 % for the facilities at municipal level; and 68.6 %, 65.4 %, and 60.5 % for the facilities at county level.
      Conclusion  The development of health emergency response framework at the provincial, municipal and county level in China has been improved in recent years but the development differs obviously by administration level and geographical region. Special concern should be paid to the development in grass roots health related facilities and the facilities in western China.

     

/

返回文章
返回