高级检索
贾昊男, 姚宁, 王亚蒙, 房慧莹, 姜可欣, 陈若卉, 张晓琳, AnastasiaGamburg, 焦明丽. 大学生初中阶段校园欺凌情况回顾性调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(8): 1179-1183. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118692
引用本文: 贾昊男, 姚宁, 王亚蒙, 房慧莹, 姜可欣, 陈若卉, 张晓琳, AnastasiaGamburg, 焦明丽. 大学生初中阶段校园欺凌情况回顾性调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(8): 1179-1183. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118692
Hao-nan JIA, Ning YAO, Ya-meng WANG, . Experience of school bullying during junior high school period among college students: a retrospective study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(8): 1179-1183. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118692
Citation: Hao-nan JIA, Ning YAO, Ya-meng WANG, . Experience of school bullying during junior high school period among college students: a retrospective study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(8): 1179-1183. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1118692

大学生初中阶段校园欺凌情况回顾性调查

Experience of school bullying during junior high school period among college students: a retrospective study

  • 摘要:
      目的  调查大学生在初中阶段遭受的校园欺凌情况,分析影响因素,结合大学生的主观选择探讨有效防制措施。
      方法  采用回顾性调查的方法,于2017年9 — 12月对黑龙江省哈尔滨市949名大学生进行调查,调查其初中阶段遭受校园欺凌情况,并从自身视角出发选择有效的防制措施。
      结果  调查对象中共148人(15.60 %)遭受过校园欺凌,其中男生84人,女生64人。性别(χ2 = 16.772,P = 0.00)、单亲家庭(χ2 = 8.185,P = 0.004)与遭受欺凌相关;女生(OR = 0.435,95 % CI = 0.299~0.633)、相对较好的经济条件(OR = 0.289,95 % CI = 0.145~0.576)、气质类型为胆汁质(OR = 0.295,95 % CI = 0.160~0.544)和多血质(OR = 0.351,95 % CI = 0.209~ 0.590)是校园欺凌的保护因素;单亲家庭(OR = 1.291,95 % CI = 1.009~1.652)、相对较差的经济条件(OR = 3.394,95 % CI = 1.641~7.019)、成绩较好(OR = 2.253,95 % CI = 1.320~3.847)是校园欺凌的危险因素。调查对象认为完善制度防制校园欺凌最为有效(65.54 %),其次是社会环境改善(56.69 %)等。
      结论  应根据遭受校园欺凌的高危因素,以及从学生视角选择制定有效的校园欺凌防制措施。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To retrospectively examine the status and influencing factors of school bullying during junior high school period among college students for developing effective measures to prevent school bullying.
      Methods  We conducted a questionnaire survey among 949 college students selected using cluster sampling in a college in Harbin city of Heilongjiang province between September and December 2017. Information on bullying and bullying victimization during junior high school were collected retrospectively and analyzed and measures for school bullying prevention were explored based on the evidences provided by the participants.
      Results  Experience of bullying and bullying victimization in junior high schools was reported by 148 (15.60%, including 84 males and 64 females) of the participants. Gender (χ2 = 16.772, P < 0.01) and in a single parent family (χ2 = 8.185, P = 0.004) are associated with bullying victimization. Female gender (odds ratio OR = 0.435, 95% confidence interval 95% CI: 0.299 – 0.633), better family economic condition (OR = 0.289, 95% CI: 0.145 – 0.576), with choleric temperament (OR = 0.295, 95% CI: 0.160 – 0.544) and sanguineous temperament (OR = 0.351, 95% CI: 0.209 – 0.590) are hindering factors for bullying victimization; whereas with a single parent family (OR = 1.291, 95% CI: 1.009 – 1.652), poor family economic condition (OR = 3.394, 95% CI: 1.641 – 7.019) and good academic achievement (OR = 2.253, 95% CI: 1.320 – 3.847) are risk factors for bullying victimization. There were 65.54% and 56.69% of the participants considering relevant regulation making and improvement of social environment being the most and the second effective measure to prevent school bullying.
      Conclusion  Risk factor-specific intervention measures for school bullying prevention should be developed based on evidences provided by the students with school bullying experience.

     

/

返回文章
返回