高级检索
代亚君, 郝艳华, 吴群红, 宁宁, 徐威, 王心瑶, 王晓菲, 陈超亿. 基于TOPSIS法卫生应急风险沟通关键问题筛选分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(8): 1213-1216. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119293
引用本文: 代亚君, 郝艳华, 吴群红, 宁宁, 徐威, 王心瑶, 王晓菲, 陈超亿. 基于TOPSIS法卫生应急风险沟通关键问题筛选分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(8): 1213-1216. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119293
Ya-jun DAI, Yan-hua HAO, Qun-hong WU, . Key issues in health emergency risk communication: a screening analysis with TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(8): 1213-1216. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119293
Citation: Ya-jun DAI, Yan-hua HAO, Qun-hong WU, . Key issues in health emergency risk communication: a screening analysis with TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(8): 1213-1216. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119293

基于TOPSIS法卫生应急风险沟通关键问题筛选分析

Key issues in health emergency risk communication: a screening analysis with TOPSIS method

  • 摘要:
      目的  明确目前我国公共卫生事件风险沟通中存在的关键问题并进行讨论。
      方法  通过检索文献对目前我国公共卫生事件风险沟通存在的问题进行梳理,以拉斯韦尔的5W模式为分析框架,整理出32个二级指标问题,对问题的严重性和干预迫切性进行专家咨询评分。于2017年7月,选取来自全国27个省市的32名卫生应急专家进行咨询,运用Excel、TOPSIS综合分析法对数据进行处理分析。
      结果  TOPSIS法结果显示,传播渠道维度Ci值为0.831排名第2,维度下2个具体问题排名前2。传播效果维度Ci值为0.883排名第1,维度下具体问题排名第3和第6。传播受众维度排名第3,Ci值为0.813,指标下具体问题排名第4和第9。传播者维度排名第4,Ci值为0.698,指标下具体问题排名第5、7、8、10。
      结论  应加强媒体特别是新媒体的监管,加强传播效果评估,重视受众并进行针对性沟通,加强主体间互动及舆论监管。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore key problems in public health emergency risk communication in China.
      Methods  We conducted a literature research on key issues in public health emergency related risk communication nowadays in China and discriminated 32 secondary issues according to analyses based on Lasswell's 5w communication model (who, says what, in which channel, to whom, and with what effect). Then we carried out an expert consultation on the significance and intervention-related urgency of the issues among 32 health emergency specialists recruited in 27 provinces and municipalities across China in July 2017. We analyzed the data collected with technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) using Microsoft Excel software.
      Results  The results of TOPSIS analyses demonstrated that among the dimensions of the risk communication, the criterion index (Ci) value of communication effect ranked the first (0.833), followed by communication channel (0.831), communication audience (0.813), and communicator (0.698). There were two secondary issues (ranking the 3rd and 6th of all secondary issues) under the communication effect dimension, two secondary issues (ranking 1st and 2nd) under the communication channel dimension, two secondary issues (ranking 4th and 9th) under the communication audience dimension, and four secondary issues (ranking 5th, 7th, 8th, and 10th) under the communication communicator dimension, respectively.
      Conclusion  Supervision and management on media, especially on new media, assessment on communication efficiency, and targeted communication with audiences need to be strengthened for improving health emergency risk communication among the public.

     

/

返回文章
返回