高级检索
王宏伟, 周欣琳, 沈航, 李瑞, 安庆玉, 徐品良, 王国辉, 董楠, 孙凯峰, 杜岩. 辽宁省2017年3个学段学生网络成瘾城乡比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(8): 1148-1150. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119421
引用本文: 王宏伟, 周欣琳, 沈航, 李瑞, 安庆玉, 徐品良, 王国辉, 董楠, 孙凯峰, 杜岩. 辽宁省2017年3个学段学生网络成瘾城乡比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(8): 1148-1150. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119421
Hong-wei WANG, Xin-lin ZHOU, Hang SHEN, . Internet addiction among urban and rural primary and high school students in Liaoning province, 2017: a comparison analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(8): 1148-1150. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119421
Citation: Hong-wei WANG, Xin-lin ZHOU, Hang SHEN, . Internet addiction among urban and rural primary and high school students in Liaoning province, 2017: a comparison analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(8): 1148-1150. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1119421

辽宁省2017年3个学段学生网络成瘾城乡比较

Internet addiction among urban and rural primary and high school students in Liaoning province, 2017: a comparison analysis

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解城乡差异与中小学生网络成瘾的关系。
      方法  于2017年9月分层整群抽样方法抽取辽宁省城市4 254名、郊县3 881名中小学生进行问卷调查。
      结果  网络成瘾报告率:乡村小学4~6年级男生(3.57 %)高于城市男生(0.89 %),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),乡村小学女生(1.77 %)与城市女生(1.36 %)差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);乡村初中男生(9.04 %)高于城市男生(4.10 %),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),乡村初中女生(4.08 %)与城市女生(3.55 %)差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);乡村高中男生(7.67 %)与城市男生(7.22 %)差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),乡村高中女生(4.44 %)低于城市女生(9.54 %),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。
      结论  网络成瘾报告率,小学高年级与初中阶段,乡村男生高于城市,城乡女生无差异;至高中阶段逆转,城市女生高于乡村,城乡男生无差异;高中生高于初中生又高于小学生;需要重点关注的是城市高中女生和乡村初中男生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore urban-rural difference in the prevalence of internet addiction among primary and high school students.
      Methods  We conducted a questionnaire survey among 4 251 urban and 3 881 rural primary and high school students recruited with stratified cluster random sampling in Liaoning province in September 2017.
      Results  Among the primary and junior high school students, the reported prevalence rate of internet addiction was significantly higher among rural boys than among the urban boys (3.57% vs. 0.89% for primary school students and 9.04% vs. 4.10% for junior high school students, both P < 0.001) but there were no significant differences in the rate between rural and urban girls (1.77% vs. 1.36% for primary school students and 4.08% vs. 3.55% for junior high school students, both P > 0.05); whereas among the senior high school students, the rural girls reported a significantly lower prevalence rate of internet addiction than the urban girls (4.44% vs. 9.54%, P < 0.001) but the rural and urban boys reported a similar prevalence rate (7.67% vs. 7.22%, P > 0.05).
      Conclusion  The self reported prevalence rate of internet addiction is higher among rural boys than among urban boys for primary and junior high school students, but lower among rural girls than among urban girls for senior high school students and the rate is not different between rural and urban girls among primary and junior high school students and between rural and urban boys for senior high school students in Liaoning province. The results need to be concerned in developing relevant interventions.

     

/

返回文章
返回