高级检索
孙婷, 唐启寿, 张武丽, 刘德培, 邓柯欣. 农村在校留守与非留守儿童心理健康服务获取现状及需求比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(12): 1623-1626. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1120954
引用本文: 孙婷, 唐启寿, 张武丽, 刘德培, 邓柯欣. 农村在校留守与非留守儿童心理健康服务获取现状及需求比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(12): 1623-1626. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1120954
Ting SUN, Qi-shou TANG, Wu-li ZHANG, . Mental health service acquisition and demand among rural left-behind and non-left-behind school children: a comparative analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(12): 1623-1626. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1120954
Citation: Ting SUN, Qi-shou TANG, Wu-li ZHANG, . Mental health service acquisition and demand among rural left-behind and non-left-behind school children: a comparative analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2018, 34(12): 1623-1626. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1120954

农村在校留守与非留守儿童心理健康服务获取现状及需求比较

Mental health service acquisition and demand among rural left-behind and non-left-behind school children: a comparative analysis

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解农村留守与非留守儿童心理健康服务获取现状、需求以及2者的差异,为留守儿童心理服务体系的建立提供参考。
      方法  于2018年4 — 7月,采用分层整群抽样法抽取四川、安徽、河南省共14所农村中小学四到九年级学生3 456人,通过自编农村留守儿童心理健康服务现状及需求问卷进行调查。
      结果  农村留守与非留守儿童接受心理健康服务比率分别为27.9 %和27.0 %,2者无统计学差异;农村留守与非留守儿童获取心理健康服务途径及引带者、心理健康服务的效果评价、希望接受心理健康服务途径与方式等也均无统计学差异(P > 0.05);留守与非留守儿童希望获取心理健康服务的比率分别为63.0 %和57.2 %,2者差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001);留守与非留守儿童在改善抑郁、焦虑等不舒服的感觉,克服回答问题或与陌生人交谈时紧张、面红心跳、流汗、口吃等现象,能够改变自己对事物的消极看法,肯定自己的价值,让自己内心强大,免于被欺凌,应对压力或其他不好事情的方式6个心理健康服务内容的需求条目上差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。
      结论  留守儿童已获取的心理健康服务比率、途径与其希望得到的服务情况有较大差距;与非留守儿童相比,留守儿童更需要心理健康服务,并且矫正性目标相关的需求更明显。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore differences in mental health service (MHS) acquisition and demand between rural left-behind and non-left-behind school children and to provide evidences for establishing MHS system.
      Methods  We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey among 3 456 primary school students of grade 4 to 6 and junior high school students of grade 1 to 3 selected in 14 schools in rural areas of Sichuan, Anhui and Henan province with stratified random cluster sampling between April and July, 2018. We used a self-designed questionnaire to assess MHS acquisition and demand among rural left-behind and non-left-behind school children.
      Results  Among the 3 146 eligible participants, there were no significant differences between left-behind and non-left-behind school children in MHS acquisition rate (27.9% vs. 27.0%), introducers of MHS providers, effect assessment on MHS received, and the way to get MHS acquisition channels (P > 0.05 for all). But there was a significant difference in the rate of MHS between left-behind children and non-left-behind school children (63.0% vs. 57.2%) (P = 0.001); significant differences were also found in demands of following 6 MHS items between the two groups of the school students: improving anxious or depressive emotion, overcoming stress symptoms when answering questions or talking with strangers (including nervousness, red face or heartbeat, sweating, and stuttering), changing passive attitude towards things encountered, self-affirmation, developing a strong mind of self, avoiding being bullied, and ways to cope with stress or other bad things (P < 0.05 for all).
      Conclusion  There are obvious disparities in acquisition rate, ways, and demands of mental health service between rural left-behind and non-left-behind school children; the rural left-behind school children need more mental health service, especially self-improvement-related items, than the non left-behind children.

     

/

返回文章
返回