高级检索
金玲玲, 叶青, 马雨杨, 董易苹, 秦真真, 王志勇, 徐斐. 社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理能力“三位一体”糖尿病精细化管理模式干预效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(5): 810-813. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121368
引用本文: 金玲玲, 叶青, 马雨杨, 董易苹, 秦真真, 王志勇, 徐斐. 社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理能力“三位一体”糖尿病精细化管理模式干预效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(5): 810-813. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121368
Ling-ling JIN, Qing YE, Yu-yang MA, . Effect of trinity involved comprehensive disease management program on self-management ability among community type 2 diabetic mellitus patients: a 2-year intervention study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(5): 810-813. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121368
Citation: Ling-ling JIN, Qing YE, Yu-yang MA, . Effect of trinity involved comprehensive disease management program on self-management ability among community type 2 diabetic mellitus patients: a 2-year intervention study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(5): 810-813. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1121368

社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理能力“三位一体”糖尿病精细化管理模式干预效果评价

Effect of trinity involved comprehensive disease management program on self-management ability among community type 2 diabetic mellitus patients: a 2-year intervention study

  • 摘要:
      目的  评价“三位一体”糖尿病精细化管理模式对社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理能力的干预效果,为提高糖尿病患者血糖控制水平提供参考依据。
      方法  于2015年10月在江苏省南京市江北新区6家社区卫生服务中心随机抽取589和563例糖尿病患者分别作为干预组和对照组进行为期2年的管理,干预组患者进行“三位一体”糖尿病精细化管理模式管理,对照组患者进行“基本公卫”模式管理;采用中文版糖尿病自我管理行为量表(SDSCA)评价2组患者干预前后的自我管理能力,比较2种管理模式的管理效果。
      结果  干预前2组患者比较,干预组和对照组患者综合自我管理能力总分分别为(12.49 ± 5.02)和(12.44 ± 4.84)分,总分达标率分别为19.9 % 和18.1 %,2组患者综合自我管理能力总分和总分达标率差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05);干预后2组患者比较,干预组患者的综合自我管理能力总分和总分达标率分别为(16.94 ± 4.09)分和57.1 %,均高于对照组患者的(14.69 ± 4.36)分和31.3 %,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。
      结论  “三位一体”糖尿病精细化管理模式较“基本公卫”模式能更有效地提高社区2型糖尿病患者的自我管理能力。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To evaluate the intervention effect of trinity (consisting of a center for disease control and prevention, a general hospital and a community health care center CHC) involved comprehensive disease management program on self-management ability among community patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) and to provide evidences for improving glycemic control in the patients.
      Methods  The participants were T2DM patients randomly recruited from six community health centers in an urban district of Nanjing city, Jiangsu province for a 2-year follow up study starting at October 2015. The participants were randomly assigned into an intervention group (Intv, n = 589) receiving a trinity involved comprehensive disease management program (including quarterly follow-up carried out by medical staff of CHC, a green channel for dual referral between a general hospital and a CHC, quarterly medical service provided by experts at a CHC, monthly health education on diabetes management conducted by nurses, 6-montly laboratory test for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and blood lipid, and annual diagnostic examination for complications) and a control group (Ctrl, n = 563) only receiving disease management covered by basic public health services (including quarterly follow-up carried out by medical staff of CHC, dual referral between a general hospital and a CHC, and quarterly blood glucose test). Face-to-face interviews were carried out before and after the intervention with a general questionnaire and the Scale of Diabetes Self-Care Activities – Chinese version (SDSCA-C) among all the participants to assess the disparity in self-management ability between the two groups.
      Results  Before the intervention, there were no significant differences between the Intv and Ctrl group in the total score of SDSCA-C (12.49 ± 5.02 vs. 12.44 ± 4.84) and in the proportion of participants achieving a target total SDSCA-C score of≥17 (19.9% vs. 18.1%). After the intervention, the total SDSCA-C score of the Intv group was significantly higher than that of Ctrl group (16.94 ± 4.09 vs. 14.69 ± 4.36, P < 0.05) and the proportion of participants achieving a target total SDSCA-C score was significantly higher in the Intv group than that in the Ctrl group (57.1% vs. 31.3%, P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  The trinity involved comprehensive disease management program is more effective than the management scheme required by basic health care services in the improvement of self-management ability among community patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus.

     

/

返回文章
返回