Comparison on quality suitability of maternal health care workers in Beijing and Shanghai: a literature analysis
-
摘要:
目的 分析2000 — 2017年京沪妇女保健人员素质不足严重程度及孕产妇死亡率的变化趋势,明确两地差异,探讨妇女保健人员素质适宜程度。 方法 收集1995 — 2017年所有涉及京沪妇女保健资源问题的文献,系统筛选涉及妇女保健人员素质主题的有关文献,进而计算妇女保健人员素质不足严重程度评分。上海纳入165篇文献,北京纳入147篇。运用Spearman相关、线性回归等方法分析妇女保健人员素质不足严重程度与孕产妇死亡率的关系。 结果 北京妇女保健人员素质不足严重程度从2000年的3.53分降至2017年的3.12分,上海则由3.70分降至2.12分。上海孕产妇死亡率与妇女保健人员素质不足严重程度相关有统计学意义(r = 0.758,P < 0.01)。上海的回归方程有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。 结论 京沪两地妇女保健人员素质不断提高,上海妇女保健人员素质在孕产妇死亡率降低中发挥更大作用,但人员专业能力仍需进一步提升;适宜的妇女保健体系应“人员能力胜任工作需要”;验证了量化妇女保健人员素质的可行性。 Abstract:Objective To examine changing trend in the severity of poor quality of maternal care workers and maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in Beijing and Shanghai from 2000 to 2017, and to analyze the disparity in the severity and MMR between the two cities for exploring the suitability for the quality of maternal health care workers. Methods Through searching literatures published on China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science from 1995 through 2017, we retrieved 147 and 165 studies on comprehensive quality of maternal health care workers in Beijing and Shanghai. A severity score was established to evaluate poor quality of the maternal health care workers. Spearman correlation and linear regression analysis were used to analyze the relationship between the poor quality severity score of the maternal health care workers and MMR for the two cities. Results The poor quality severity score for the maternal health care workers in Beijing decreased from 3.53 in 2000 to 3.12 in 2017; while that for the workers in Shanghai decreased from 3.70 to 2.12. A significant correlation between the MMR and poor quality severity score for maternal health care workers during the period was observed in Shanghai (r = 0.758, P < 0.01). Conclusion Based on the quantitative analysis, the comprehensive quality of maternal health care workers in Beijing and Shanghai increased during 2000 – 2017 and the increasing is more obvious for the workers in Shanghai, although the workers′ quality still needs to be improved. -
Key words:
- maternal health care /
- quality /
- severity score /
- Beijing /
- Shanghai
-
表 1 北京和上海2000 — 2017年孕产妇死亡率和人力素质不足严重程度评分情况
年份 户籍人口孕产妇死亡率(1/10万) 人力素质不足严重程度评分(分) 北京市 上海市 北京市 上海市 2000 9.70 9.61 3.53 3.70 2001 11.71 8.95 3.42 3.55 2002 15.12 9.99 3.33 3.51 2003 15.60 11.99 3.26 3.44 2004 15.19 10.79 3.22 3.30 2005 15.91 1.40 3.22 3.18 2006 7.87 8.31 3.24 3.10 2007 16.74 6.68 3.14 3.00 2008 18.52 6.91 3.12 2.92 2009 14.55 7.08 3.12 2.71 2010 12.14 5.30 3.11 2.71 2011 9.09 1.04 3.10 2.63 2012 6.05 4.27 3.04 2.50 2013 9.45 7.74 3.14 2.37 2014 7.19 3.39 3.12 2.23 2015 8.69 4.16 3.15 2.27 2016 10.83 2.53 3.15 2.16 2017 8.17 1.01 3.12 2.12 表 2 北京和上海妇女保健人力素质不足严重程度与孕产妇死亡率回归分析
城市 回归系数 常数项 R2 值 P值 北京 4.019 – 1.038 0.017 0.601 上海 4.860 – 7.702 0.531 0.001 -
[1] 世界卫生组织. 2013世界卫生报告[R]. 日内瓦: 世界卫生组织, 2013. [2] 田莉. 妇幼保健专业人员应具备的素质和能力[J]. 临床医药文献杂志, 2015, 2(1): 175 – 176. [3] 胡淑怡, 杜莉, 朱蓉, 等. 上海市产科医生心理健康状况的调查研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(16): 3341 – 3344. [4] 李禾, 杨惠娟, 于莹, 等. 北京市助产士人力资源现况分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(13): 2583 – 2585. [5] Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, et al. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980 – 2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5[J]. The Lancet, 2010, 375(9726): 1609 – 1623. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60518-1 [6] 郝模. 卫生政策学[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 30 – 33. [7] Ellencweig AY. Analyzing health systems: a modular approach[M].London: Oxford University Press, 1992. [8] 姜晓朋, 王薇, 宋宝良, 等. 乡镇卫生院卫生人力素质综合评价指标及其检验[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2001, 4(2): 73 – 75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2001.02.010 [9] 齐庆青, 丁辉. 北京市职业妇女保健工作的实践和体会[J]. 中国医院管理, 2002, 22(11): 44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5329.2002.11.028 [10] 刘芳, 李娟, 王晓静, 等. 杨浦区中老年妇女预防骨质疏松及营养摄入状况调查[J]. 中国健康教育, 2003, 19(11): 886 – 887. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9982.2003.11.029 [11] 肖杏琴, 毛红芳, 王海鸣, 等. 2008 — 2013年上海市嘉定区妇科病、乳腺病筛查项目实践情况[J]. 上海预防医学, 2014, 26(7): 379 – 380. [12] 郝模. 健康中国的基石: 适宜公共卫生体系[A]. “健康中国与公众健康”复旦论坛暨公共卫生体系适宜程度首次发布会主旨报告[C]. 上海: 复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心, 2019. [13] 王光荣. 卫生人力综合素质评价方法进展[J]. 国外医学(医学教育分册), 2000(2): 38 – 40. [14] 李涛, 周晓兰, 张红霞, 等. 北京市朝阳区产前筛查技术服务机构现状调查[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2013, 20(6): 118 – 121.