Administrative capacity for perceiving infectious disease-related public health needs in Liaoning and Jilin province: a literature study
-
摘要:
目的 探寻辽吉两地把握公众传染病健康需要能力的方法及意义。 方法 运用描述性方法分析两地把握公众传染病健康需要在2007 — 2016年的变迁情况。利用Spearman 相关性分析把握公众传染病健康需要的程度与传染病发病率的关系。 结果 吉林把握公众传染病健康需要的程度由 2007年的1.5 % 提升至2016年的16.3 %,辽宁由 2007年的25.4 % 下降至 2016年的10.1 %。辽吉两地把握公众传染病健康需要程度与传染病发病率均为负相关。 结论 辽吉两地能够总体把握公众传染病健康需要,但在识别需要的连续性与系统性方面需加强。随着辽吉两地把握公众健康需要的程度不断提升,传染病发病率逐渐降低,能满足公众传染病健康需要,对制定决策有参考。 Abstract:Objective To examine government agencies′ capacity for perceiving infectious disease-related public health needs and the impact of the capacity on infectious disease epidemics in Liaoning and Jilin province. Methods By searching official websites and internet databases, we retrieved 181 documents and literatures referring infectious disease-related public health needs published by government agencies and health institutions of Liaoning and Jilin province from 2007 through 2016. Descriptive analyses were performed and Spearman correlation analysis was adopted to explore the relationship between the perceiving capability and infectious disease incidence. Results The measure of government agencies′ capacity for perceiving infectious disease-related public health needs increased from 1.5% in 2007 to 16.3% in 2016 in Jilin province but the measure decreased from 25.4% in 2007 to 10.1% in 2016 in Liaoning province. Inverse correlations between the capacity's measure and the incidence of infectious diseases during the 10-year period were observed in the two provinces. Conclusion The government agencies of Liaoning and Jilin province have a general capacity to perceive infectious disease-related public health needs but the two domains – continuity and systematicness need to be improved. -
Key words:
- public needs /
- infectious disease /
- Liaoning province /
- Jilin province
-
表 1 2007 — 2016年辽吉把握公众传染病健康需要的程度(%)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 识别公众需要的权威程度 吉林 3.0 3.2 3.5 2.2 3.7 3.7 26.6 26.8 29.0 29.1 辽宁 25.6 28.0 28.3 30.6 30.6 30.8 31.2 31.6 31.8 32.0 识别公众需要的及时程度 吉林 6.3 6.9 7.5 8.1 8.0 8.0 23.8 23.9 25.3 25.4 辽宁 18.9 20.2 20.4 21.9 21.9 22.2 23.0 23.9 24.3 24.8 识别公众需要的连续程度 吉林 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 4.3 辽宁 0.0 5.8 6.4 0.1 7.3 6.9 6.6 6.3 6.1 4.0 最具权威报告的系统程度 吉林 35.7 36.2 36.2 37.7 37.7 37.7 38.6 38.4 39.2 39.3 辽宁 39.2 38.9 40.1 40.2 40.1 37.9 37.6 37.3 37.1 37.0 把握公众需要的可信程度 吉林 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.8 25.2 辽宁 63.1 63.1 64.0 69.7 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 综合:把握公众传染病健康需要的程度 吉林 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.4 8.5 18.4 16.3 辽宁 25.4 26.6 26.8 27.9 21.2 10.0 10.1 10.3 10.3 10.1 传染病发病率(1/10万) 吉林 208.0 9 233.96 258.48 245.63 259.50 233.14 194.96 203.27 174.26 145.78 辽宁 220.67 214.14 215.84 207.08 233.59 230.88 209.54 236.07 211.18 200.70 -
[1] 刘继同. 健康需要的基本特点与医疗卫生政策涵义[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2005(2): 68 – 69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4663.2005.02.001 [2] 解瑞谦, 阚坚力. 公众对传染病突发公共卫生事件的信息需求特征分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2010, 26(1): 43 – 45. [3] 宋慧宇. 政府治理决策中的公民参与机制研究[J]. 社会科学战线, 2018(3): 202 – 209. [4] 郝模, 李程跃, 于明珠, 等. 新时代公共卫生体系的思考与研究[J]. 上海预防医学, 2017(12): 905910. [5] 肖巍. 从"非典"看公共健康的意义 —— 访丹尼尔·维克勒教授[J]. 哲学动态, 2003(7): 40 – 42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8862.2003.07.010 [6] 张斯钰, 罗普泉, 高立冬. 中国重点新发传染病的流行现状与应对策略[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2012, 16(10): 892 – 896. [7] 课题组.《上海现代化国际大都市公共卫生绩效体系构建》结题报告[R]. 2018. [8] 刘东峰, 孙岩松. 重大传染病疫情应急防控实践总结与思考[J]. 武警医学, 2016, 27(12): 1189 – 1192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2016.12.001 [9] 郑照东, 袁作堂. 公共卫生传染病控制措施探究[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版), 2017(96): 292 – 292. [10] 古丽娜·朱马汗. 社区居民对常见传染病认知现状及风险管理措施[J]. 中国卫生产业, 2018(14): 146 – 147. [11] 刘敏, 姚文清, 孙英伟, 等. 2005年辽宁省法定传染病疫情网络直报质量评价[J]. 疾病监测, 2007, 22(3): 213 – 214. doi: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2007.03.027 [12] 张抒, 于娣, 马月丹. 辽宁省病毒性肝炎流行趋势分析及疫情预测[J]. 职业与健康, 2014, 30(9): 1227 – 1229.