Influence factors of mobile phone addiction among college students in Hainan province: a structural equation model-based analysis
-
摘要:
目的 了解海南省大学生手机成瘾情况及其影响因素,为制定海南省大学生手机成瘾干预机制提供理论依据。 方法 于2017年10 — 11月采用分层随机抽样方法,在海南省抽取2 407名大学本科生进行手机成瘾倾向量表(MPATS)、时间管理倾向量表(TMDS)和人际问题量表(IIP-32)调查,并应用结构方程模型分析手机成瘾的影响因素。 结果 海南省MPATS量表戒断症状、突显行为、社交抚慰、心境改变维度得分和成瘾总分分别为(16.33 ± 4.95)、(9.32 ± 3.45)、(7.17 ± 2.74)、(7.56 ± 2.67)和(40.38 ± 11.93)分;海南省2 407名大学生中,手机成瘾者648人,手机成瘾比例为26.92 %;TMDS量表时间价值感、时间监控观、时间效能感分量表得分和时间管理倾向总分分别为(28.23 ± 6.38)、(57.11 ± 12.38)、(26.70 ± 5.65)和(112.04 ± 22.02)分;IIP-32量表难以善于社交、难以果断自信、难以得到支持、难以与他人建立深入关系、过于与人争斗、过于开放、过于关注他人、过于依赖维度得分和人际问题总分分别为(9.10 ± 3.58)、(10.15 ± 3.54)、(9.43 ± 3.49)、(9.85 ± 3.55)、(9.20 ± 3.30)、(9.82 ± 3.41)、(10.50 ± 3.51)、(9.91 ± 3.40)和(77.95 ± 22.47)分;结构方程模型分析结果显示,时间管理和人际问题呈显著负相关(β ′ = – 0.165,P < 0.001),时间管理(β ′ = 0.025)对手机成瘾影响并不显著(P > 0.05),人际关系(β ′ = 0.473)对于手机成瘾影响显著(P < 0.001)。 结论 海南省大学生手机成瘾情况不容忽视,人际问题是手机成瘾的主要影响因素。 Abstract:Objective To examine the prevalence and influencing factors of mobile phone addiction (MPA) among college students in Hainan province and to provide evidences for developing measures on intervention of MPA in the students. Methods We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey among 2 753 undergraduates recruited with stratified random sampling in four universities in Hainan province during October – November 2017. Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale (MPATS), Time Management Tendency Scale (TMDS) and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Short Version (IIP-32) were used in the survey. Structural equation model (SEM) was adopted to analyze influence factors of MPA. Results For the 2 407 students, the mean MPATS domain scores were 16.33 ± 4.95 for withdrawal symptoms, 9.32 ± 3.45 for salience, 7.17 ± 2.74 for social comfort, and 7.56 ± 2.67 for mood change and the mean overall MPATS was 40.38 ± 11.93, respectively. Of all the students, 26.92% (648) were assessed with MPA. For all the students, the TMDS domain scores were 28.23 ± 6.38 for time value sense, 57.11 ± 12.38 for time surveillance, 26.70 ± 5.65 for time efficacy sense, and 112.04 ± 22.018 for time management tendency; the IIP-32 dimensional scores were 9.10 ± 3.58 for hard to be social, 10.15 ± 3.54 for hard to be assertive, 9.43 ± 3.49 for hard to be supportive, 9.85 ± 3.55 for hard to be involved, 9.20 ± 3.30 for too aggressive, 9.82 ± 3.41 for too open, 10.50 ± 3.51 for too caring, and 9.91 ± 3.40 for too dependent and the overall IIP-32 score was 77.95 ± 22.47, respectively. SEM analysis demonstrated a significant inverse correlation between time management tendency and interpersonal relationship (β ′ = – 0.165, P < 0.001) and interpersonal relationship had a significant impact on MPA (β ′ = 0.473, P < 0.001). Conclusion Mobile phone addiction is prevalent and mainly influenced by interpersonal relationship problems among college students in Hainan province. -
表 1 海南省不同特征大学生手机成瘾情况比较
特征 调查数 手机成瘾数 手机成瘾比例(%) χ2 值 P 值 性别 男生 833 217 26.05 0.491 0.483 女生 1 574 431 27.38 年级 大一 543 99 18.23 33.413 < 0.001 大二 759 224 29.51 大三 584 453 77.57 大四/大五 521 172 33.01 专业 文史类 778 233 29.95 6.274 0.180 理工类 727 188 25.86 医学类 542 131 24.17 艺术类 76 19 25.00 其他 284 77 27.11 家庭所在地 城镇 1 214 327 26.94 < 0.001 0.987 农村 1 193 321 26.91 每天手机使用时间(h) < 1 44 10 22.73 48.432 < 0.001 1~ 209 44 21.05 2~ 448 86 19.20 3~ 499 108 21.64 ≥ 4 1 207 400 33.14 -
[1] 孙江伟, 李琳, 林超, 等. 大学生手机依赖综合征及与孤独感关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(9): 1147 – 1150. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-09-12 [2] 中国互联网信息中心. CNNIC: 2019年第43次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL]. [2019 – 02 – 28]. http://www.199it.com/archives/839540.html. [3] Taneja C. The psychology of excessive cellular phone use[J]. Delhi Psychiatry, 2014, 17: 448 – 451. [4] 熊婕, 周宗奎, 陈武, 等. 大学生手机成瘾倾向量表的编制[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(3): 222 – 225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.03.013 [5] 黄希庭, 张志杰. 青少年时间管理倾向量表的编制[J]. 心理学报, 2001, 33(4): 338 – 343. [6] Benjamin LS. Interpersonal reconstructive therapy: an integrative, personality-based treatment for complex cases[M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2006. [7] Byrne BB. Structural equation modeling using AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming[M]. 2nd Ed. New York: Routledge Press, 2010. [8] 邹艳, 陈善娇, 董倩, 等. 海南大学生手机成瘾现状及与人格关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2017, 25(9): 1372 – 1375. [9] 王安妹, 郑海英, 王亚楠, 等. 手机成瘾对大学生学业情绪和人际交往能力的影响[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2017, 16(14): 132 – 133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5641.2017.14.073 [10] 罗鑫森, 熊思成, 张斌, 等. 大学生手机成瘾与抑郁的关系: 孤独感的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2019, 27(6): 915 – 918. [11] 钟楚娴, 杨阳, 单鹏程, 等. 江苏省大学生手机成瘾现状调查[J]. 当代教育实践与教学研究, 2017(12): 220 – 221. [12] 贺玉川, 郭加宏, 周红卫. 小学生网络成瘾时间管理能力干预效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2009, 25(12): 1513 – 1514. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-12-55 [13] 彭红雷, 姜旭英. 大学生网络成瘾与时间管理倾向关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(6): 764 – 765. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-39 [14] 俞锋. 大学生手机成瘾心理机制及教育策略研究[J]. 黑龙江教育学院学报, 2019, 38(5): 104 – 106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7836.2019.05.035