Coverage of government concerns over infectious diseases to be controlled in Guangxi and Yunnan province, 2000 – 2017: a comparison analysis
-
摘要:
目的 了解云南、广西两地关注传染病问题范围变化趋势,比较两地政府对传染病问题关注范围的异同并分析原因。 方法 系统收集云南、广西两地2000 — 2017年所有传染病相关政策文件、法律规定和制度等共429篇,并计算关注范围;运用Spearman相关性分析关注范围与传染病发病率之间的关系。 结果 云南关注传染病问题范围为76.9 %,增长幅度14.3 %;广西关注传染病问题范围为80.8 %,增长幅度20.1 %。广西关注传染病问题范围与传染病发病率之间呈显著正相关(r = 0.874,P < 0.01),云南关注传染病问题范围与传染病发病率之间无显著相关。 结论 广西传染病领域的关注范围高于云南,且增长幅度更大。两地关注传染病问题范围均有显著提升,关注问题范围这一量化指标具有可行性。 Abstract:Objective To examine changes in the coverage of government concerns over the infectious diseases to be controlled in Yunnan province and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Guangxi) and to compare disparities in the changes and correlates between the two provinces. Methods We conducted systematical online searches to retrieve policy documents, legal provisions and regulations related to control and prevention of infectious diseases issued by government departments of Yunnan and Guangxi province from 2000 to 2017. The region- and year-specific ratio of the infectious diseases involved by the published government administrative documents versus those to be concerned objectively was estimated and compared. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the coverage ratio and the incidence of infectious diseases. Results Totally 215 and 214 documents issued by Yunan and Guangxi government departments were retrieved. Compared to those in 2000, the coverage ratio increased by 17.1% (78.8% vs. 67.3%) for Yunnan and 20.1% (80.8% vs. 67.3%) for Guangxi in 2017, respectively. A significant positive correlation was observed between the coverage of infectious diseases concerned and the incidence of infectious disease in Guangxi (r = 0.874, P < 0.01), but not observed in Yunnan. Conclusion The coverage of government concerns over the infectious diseases to be controlled increased significantly in both Yunnan and Guangxi province and the increment was more obvious in Guangxi from 2000 to 2017. The study demonstrates a feasibility for quantitative analysis on the coverage of infectious diseases under concerns of control and prevention. -
Key words:
- infectious disease /
- concern coverage /
- health need /
- government-leading
-
表 1 云南、广西两地关注传染病问题范围及传染病发病率(%)
指标 地区 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 传染病关注问题范围 云南 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 71.2 71.2 71.2 71.2 73.1 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 76.9 76.9 76.9 76.9 78.8 广西 67.3 69.2 69.2 69.2 73.1 73.1 76.9 76.9 78.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 常见传染病 云南 83.3 83.3 83.3 83.3 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 90.5 92.9 92.9 92.9 92.9 92.9 92.9 92.9 92.9 92.9 广西 83.3 83.3 83.3 83.3 88.1 88.1 90.5 90.5 92.9 95.2 95.2 95.2 95.2 95.2 95.2 95.2 95.2 95.2 疫苗可预防传染病 云南 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 广西 82.8 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 新发传染病 云南 55.6 55.6 55.6 55.6 77.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 广西 55.6 55.6 55.6 55.6 77.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 其他传染病 云南 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 广西 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 医源性感染 云南 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 广西 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 传染病发病率(1/10万) 云南 175.1 221.0 216.3 253.2 239.5 215.6 188.8 190.2 197.9 179.5 218.9 206.4 208.5 207.7 187.9 195.0 广西 317.3 314.3 381.1 416.5 410.0 405.0 448.5 441.5 489.6 558.8 933.7 809.4 971.6 871.8 1 103.6 895.0 1 073.5 表 2 云南、广西两地关注传染病问题范围变化趋势
问题类型 应关注问题数 实际关注问题数 关注范围(%) 变化幅度(%) 云南 广西 云南 广西 2000 2017 2000 2017 2000 2017 2000 2017 云南 广西 传染病领域关注问题范围 52 35 41 35 42 67.3 78.8 67.3 80.8 17.1 20.1 常见传染病 42 35 39 35 40 83.3 92.9 83.3 95.2 11.5 14.3 疫苗可预防传染病 29 24 25 24 25 82.8 86.2 82.8 86.2 4.1 4.1 新发传染病 9 5 8 5 8 55.6 88.9 55.6 88.9 59.9 59.9 其他传染病 2 0 1 0 1 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 医源性感染 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -
[1] 邹郁松. 我国传染病现状及防治体系建设[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2007(1): 14 – 17, 29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-548X.2007.01.005 [2] 段雪飞, 吴璐, 谢雯. 禽流感和人感染高致病性禽流感[J]. 中国临床医生, 2006, 34(1): 29 – 30. [3] Kalimo JC, Mortality statistical notes for health planners[M]. Washington DC: National Centre for Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, 1977: 14. [4] 金松华. 应对传染病的国际防控机制研究[D]. 青岛大学, 2011. [5] 邓国胜. 公共服务提供的组织形态及其选择[J]. 中国行政管理, 2009(9): 125 – 128. [6] 陶莹, 李程跃, 于明珠, 等. 公共卫生体系要素的确认与研究[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2018, 21(3): 207 – 213. [7] 郝模, 李程跃, 于明珠, 等. 新时代公共卫生体系的思考与研究[J]. 上海预防医学, 2017, 29(12): 905 – 910. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9231.2017.12.001 [8] 张俊杰, 陈智平, 谭毅, 等. 2005 — 2015年广西法定报告传染病流行特征分析[J]. 应用预防医学, 2017, 23(1): 68 – 71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-758X.2017.01.019 [9] 雷芝樱, 陈娜萦. 广西传染病疫情报告历史与现状分析[J]. 中国热带医学, 2008(5): 832 – 833. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9727.2008.05.065 [10] 卫生部办公厅. 《2006 — 2015年全国重点寄生虫病防治规划》[EB/OL]. (2006 – 03 – 21) [2006 – 06 – 07]. http://www.moh.gov.cn/mohbgt/pw10604/200804/27592.shtml [11] 广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会. 《关于印发广西重点寄生虫病防治实施方案(2017 — 2020)的通知》[EB/OL]. (2017 – 08 – 31) [2017 – 09 – 05]. http://www.gxhfpc.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkml/ggwsts/jbkz/2017/0905/612.html [12] 云南人力资源和社会保障网. 《“健康云南”2030规划纲要》[EB/OL]. (2017 – 08 – 11) [2017 – 09 – 01]. http://www.ynhrss.gov.cn/NewsView.aspx?NewsID=24238&ClassID=526 [13] 付志智, 蔡富文, 韩姗珊, 等. 2011 ― 2015年广西水痘疫情监测分析[J]. 华南预防医学, 2017, 43(1): 43 – 46. [14] 郝模. 卫生政策学[M]. 第2版, 人民卫生出版社, 2013. [15] 安建增, 何晔. 论提供公共卫生服务的组织形态及其选择[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2012(1): 26 – 28, 35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4663.2012.01.009 [16] 刘继同. 健康需要的基本特点与医疗卫生政策含义[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2005(2): 68 – 69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4663.2005.02.001 [17] 傅冬红, 方伟岗, 姚树印, 等. 从SRAS到禽流感看政府在公共卫生体系建设上的主导作用[J]. 中华医学科研管理杂志, 2006(1): 13 – 16. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-1924.2006.01.004 [18] 祝江斌. 重大传染病疫情地方政府应对能力研究[D]. 武汉理工大学, 2011. [19] Ellencweig AY. Analyzing health systems: a modular approach[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1992.
计量
- 文章访问数: 1610
- HTML全文浏览量: 371
- PDF下载量: 16
- 被引次数: 0