高级检索
王艳霞, 张舒惟, 肖罗茜, 宋宏琳, 罗志, CheaMunyrith, 施艺, 朵林. 柬埔寨社区贫困先心病儿童3种不同现场筛查方式成本效益比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(12): 1752-1754. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125585
引用本文: 王艳霞, 张舒惟, 肖罗茜, 宋宏琳, 罗志, CheaMunyrith, 施艺, 朵林. 柬埔寨社区贫困先心病儿童3种不同现场筛查方式成本效益比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(12): 1752-1754. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125585
WANG Yan-xia, ZHANG Shu-wei, XIAO Luo-xi, . Cost-effectiveness comparison among three different methods for congenital heart disease screening among children in impoverished communities in Cambodian[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(12): 1752-1754. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125585
Citation: WANG Yan-xia, ZHANG Shu-wei, XIAO Luo-xi, . Cost-effectiveness comparison among three different methods for congenital heart disease screening among children in impoverished communities in Cambodian[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(12): 1752-1754. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125585

柬埔寨社区贫困先心病儿童3种不同现场筛查方式成本效益比较

Cost-effectiveness comparison among three different methods for congenital heart disease screening among children in impoverished communities in Cambodian

  • 摘要:
      目的  比较柬埔寨社区贫困先心病儿童3种不同现场筛查方式,为“一带一路”卫生援外项目工作提供参考。
      方法  于2018年,通过横断面调查方法,收集柬埔寨4省社区儿童先心病筛查现场筛查的相关数据并进行计算,得出中国医生组、中柬混合医生组及柬埔寨医生组3种筛查队现场筛查成本、每例儿童筛查成本、发现疑似及确诊病例成本及医务人员人均筛查成本,分析3种不同筛查队的成本效益。
      结果  中国医生筛查支出为2 122.25元/(人·d),筛检1名儿童成本19.37元,确诊1名患儿成本9 794.99元;中柬医生分别为1 191.93元/(人·d)、42.12及23 838.54元;柬埔寨医生分别为691元/(人·d),11.46及13 820.00元。
      结论  中国医生组筛查人均单位成本最高,效率最高,中柬医生组次之,柬埔寨医生组筛查成本最低,筛查效率最低。柬埔寨医生参与筛查工作中,当地认同度高,社区动员及可持续性好,有利于减少医疗风险。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To compare the cost-effectiveness of three different methods for congenital heart disease (CHD) screening among the children living in impoverished Cambodian communities and to provide references for improving health care foreign aid project under the Belt and Road Initiative.
      Methods  In 2018, we collected the data on screening of CHD in community children in four provinces of Cambodia. The cost for examination of per child, diagnostic cost per confirmed case, and cost for medical personnel were calculated for one of the three screening implementations performed by the team of Chinese medical staff, Chinese and Cambodian staff, and Cambodia staff trained by Chinese professionals, respectively.
      Results  For the screenings conducted by a team of Chinese staff, Chinese and Cambodian staff, and Cambodian staff, the cost for medical workers were 2 122.25, 1 191.93, and 691.00 (yuan RMB) per worker/per day; the cost for one child′s screening were 19.37, 42.12, and 11.46; and the total cost for the confirmation of one CHD case were 9 794.99, 23 838.54, and 13 820.00, respectively.
      Conclusion  Both the per capita unit cost and the effectiveness are the highest for the screening conducted by the team of Chinese medical staff, followed by the screening by the team of Chinese and Cambodian staff, but the cost and the effectiveness are the lowest for the screening by the team of Cambodian staff. The screening performed by both Chinese and Cambodian medical staff is of high approval and good community mobilization and sustainability, which are helpful to reduce medical practice-related risk.

     

/

返回文章
返回