高级检索
潘舒娅, 周波, 杨程惠, 王璐瑶, 钟雪梅, 黄雨兰, 汪瑾宇. 中国职业紧张反应量表编制[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(2): 157-160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125878
引用本文: 潘舒娅, 周波, 杨程惠, 王璐瑶, 钟雪梅, 黄雨兰, 汪瑾宇. 中国职业紧张反应量表编制[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(2): 157-160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125878
PAN Shu-ya, ZHOU Bo, YANG Cheng-hui, . Development of an Occupational Strain Scale for Chinese workers[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(2): 157-160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125878
Citation: PAN Shu-ya, ZHOU Bo, YANG Cheng-hui, . Development of an Occupational Strain Scale for Chinese workers[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(2): 157-160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1125878

中国职业紧张反应量表编制

Development of an Occupational Strain Scale for Chinese workers

  • 摘要:
      目的  编制职业紧张反应量表,评价其信效度。
      方法  采用文献回顾、半结构式访谈、专家咨询、人群预调查等方法形成初始量表。在四川省成都、绵阳、南充、眉山、乐山5座城市的10所特定单位抽取2 191名在职人员,对其职业紧张情况进行分析。将样本随机分为两部分,样本1(n = 1 096)采用探索性因素分析等方法筛选条目;样本2(n = 1 095)用于信、效度检验,采用验证性因素分析检验效度,采用克朗巴赫系数和折半系数评价信度。
      结果  正式量表包括认知行为紧张反应、心理紧张反应、躯体紧张反应3个维度15个条目,可解释总变异的68.796 %。验证性因素结果表明,三因素模型拟合良好(χ2/df = 3.894,NFI = 0.969,CFI = 0.977,IFI = 0.977,TLI = 0.971,RMSEA = 0.051)。总量表的 Cronbach α系数为0.935,各分量表α系数在0.789~0.923之间;总量表的折半系数为0.863,各分量表折半系数在0.766~0.898之间,表明该量表具有较好的信度。
      结论  该量表具有良好的信效度,可以用来测量中国职业紧张反应情况。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To develop an Occupational Strain Scale for Chinese employees and to evaluate its reliability and validity.
      Methods  An initial scale was developed based on literature reviews, semi-structured interviews, Delphi expert consultation and a pilot survey. Then the complied scale was self-administered online among 2 432 in-service employees sampled at 10 domestic enterprises and institutions in 5 cities of Sichuan province during March 2019. Valid information were collected from 2 191 responders; of them, 1 096 were assessed for exploratory factor analysis and other process for item screening and 1 095 were assessed for the scale's reliability and validity analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was adopted in validity test and Cronbach'α and split-half reliability were used in reliability evaluation.
      Results  The established scale included 15 items for cognitive behavioral, psychological and physical strain, which could explain 68.796% of total variance of the scale. The results of confirmatory factors analysis demonstrated that the three-domain model fitted well (χ2/df = 3.894, normed fit index = 0.969, comparative fit index = 0.977, incremental fit index = 0.977, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.971, root mean square error of approximation = 0.051). The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.935 for the general scale and ranged 0.789 – 0.923 for the 3 subscales. The split-half reliability coefficient was 0.863 for the general scale, and ranged 0.766 – 0.898 for the 3 subscales.
      Conclusion  The developed Occupational Strain Scale is of good reliability and validity and could be applied for measurement of occupational strain in Chinese working populations.

     

/

返回文章
返回