高级检索
赵晶, 赵建国, 李长富, 马萃, 方新林, 李琪, 吴夕, 王凯. 近视发生敏感期小学生户外活动时间及与近视关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(5): 784-787. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1127160
引用本文: 赵晶, 赵建国, 李长富, 马萃, 方新林, 李琪, 吴夕, 王凯. 近视发生敏感期小学生户外活动时间及与近视关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(5): 784-787. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1127160
ZHAO Jing, ZHAO Jian-guo, LI Chang-fu, . Association of outdoor activity time with myopia among schoolchildren at vulnerable age of myopia onset[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(5): 784-787. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1127160
Citation: ZHAO Jing, ZHAO Jian-guo, LI Chang-fu, . Association of outdoor activity time with myopia among schoolchildren at vulnerable age of myopia onset[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(5): 784-787. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1127160

近视发生敏感期小学生户外活动时间及与近视关系

Association of outdoor activity time with myopia among schoolchildren at vulnerable age of myopia onset

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解北京市近视发生敏感期(10~11岁)小学生户外活动时间现状,探讨其与近视的相关性。
      方法  采用整群抽样方法,于2018年11 — 12月在北京市海淀区城区随机抽取11所小学2 031名10~11岁小学生,对其进行问卷调查及近视检查。
      结果  北京市海淀区10~11岁小学生平均户外活动时间为(2.24 ± 0.67)h/d。其中户外休闲时间为(1.12 ± 0.46)h/d,户外运动时间为(1.12 ± 0.40)h/d。该群小学生近视检出率为62.3 %。近视组(1 266人)与正视组(765人)小学生平均每天户外活动时间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。分层分析结果显示,近视组小学生户外休闲时间(1.11 ± 0.44)h/d低于正视组小学生(1.15 ± 0.49)h/d,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。其中,休息日和学习日近视组小学生户外休闲时间分别为(1.21 ± 0.87)、(1.06 ± 0.45)h/d,均低于正视组的(1.33 ± 1.01)、(1.09 ± 0.49)h/d,但2组在休息日的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),在学习日差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论  北京市海淀区10~11岁小学生每天户外活动时间不足, 近视检出率高。近视组小学生户外休闲时间低于正视组学生,2组小学生户外休闲时间的差异主要源于休息日。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine the time spent on outdoor activities and its association with myopia among urban Beijing schoolchildren at vulnerable age of myopia onset.
      Methods  Using cluster sampling, we conducted a questionnaire survey and visual examination among 2 196 schoolchildren aged 10 – 11 years in 11 primary schools in an urban district of Beijing during November – December 2018.
      Results  For the 2 031 valid participants, the average outdoor activity time was 2.24 ± 0.67 hours per day (h/d) and the outdoor time for leisure and physical activities were 1.12 ± 0.46 h/d and 1.12 ± 0.40 h/d, respectively. The detection rate of myopia among the participants was 62.3%. The overall outdoor activity time was not significantly different between the 1 266 myopic participants and the 765 participants with normal vision (P > 0.05). The subgroup analysis demonstrated that the myopic participants had significantly less outdoor leisure time than the normal vision participants did (1.11 ± 0.44 h/d vs. 1.15 ± 0.49 h/d, P < 0.05); while, the disparity was significantly different only for the outdoor leisure time on weekends (1.21 ± 0.87 h/d vs. 1.33 ± 1.01 h/d, P < 0.05) but not for that on weekdays (1.06 ± 0.45 h/d vs. 1.09 ± 0.49 h/d, P > 0.05).
      Conclusion  Among the schoolchildren aged 10 – 11 years in urban Beijing, the outdoor activity time is insufficient and the detection rate of myopia is high; the schoolchildren with myopia spend less outdoor leisure time on weekends than those with normal vision.

     

/

返回文章
返回