高级检索
林志萍, 王丽萍, 余斌, 李海清, 郑建盛. 抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间一线防疫人员不良情绪反应及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(5): 677-681. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128285
引用本文: 林志萍, 王丽萍, 余斌, 李海清, 郑建盛. 抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间一线防疫人员不良情绪反应及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(5): 677-681. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128285
Zhi-ping LIN, Li-ping WANG, Bin YU, . Adverse emotional response and its influencing factors among frontline health workers during coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(5): 677-681. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128285
Citation: Zhi-ping LIN, Li-ping WANG, Bin YU, . Adverse emotional response and its influencing factors among frontline health workers during coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(5): 677-681. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128285

抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间一线防疫人员不良情绪反应及其影响因素分析

Adverse emotional response and its influencing factors among frontline health workers during coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎(新冠肺炎)疫情期间一线防疫人员不良情绪反应及其影响因素,为促进其心理健康提供参考依据。
      方法  于2020年2月4 — 7日采用自行设计的一般情况调查表及突发性公共卫生事件心理问卷和简易应对方式问卷对在福建省福州市、莆田市、泉州市、厦门市和龙岩市随机抽取的258名奋战在福建省防疫前线的一线防疫人员进行问卷调查,并应用多元线性逐步回归模型和非递归路径分析模型分析一线防疫人员情绪反应的影响因素。
      结果  抗击新冠肺炎期间一线防疫人员的不良情绪得分从高到低依次为恐惧(0.63 ± 0.49)分、抑郁(0.24 ± 0.39)分、疑病(0.22 ± 0.34)分、神经衰弱(0.18 ± 0.32)分和强迫焦虑(0.10 ± 0.23)分;应对方式的积极问题关注、积极情绪关注、消极问题关注、消极情绪关注和心理疏导得分分别为(1.20 ± 0.72)、(1.45 ± 0.82)、(0.62 ± 0.57)、(0.75 ± 0.65)和(1.41 ± 1.01)分。多元线性逐步回归分析结果显示,自我防护较差和消极问题关注较高的一线防疫人员抑郁状况较重,自我防护较差、近距离接触过可疑或确诊病例、消极情绪关注较高和积极情绪关注较低的一线防疫人员神经衰弱状况较重,女性和自我防护较差的一线防疫人员恐惧状况较重,自我防护较差、消极情绪关注较高和积极情绪关注较低的一线防疫人员强迫焦虑状况较重,女性、自我防护较差和近距离接触过可疑或确诊病例的一线防疫人员疑病状况较重。非递归路径分析结果显示,自我防护情况对恐惧、神经衰弱、抑郁、疑病和强迫焦虑状况均产生影响,其标准化总效应(直接效应 + 间接效应)分别为0.336、0.354、0.274、0.286和0.294;消极情绪关注和消极问题关注是抑郁和强迫焦虑状态的完全中介因素。
      结论  应对方式对情绪反应有调节作用,可通过加强自我防护、改变消极应对方式等减少抗击新冠肺炎期间一线防疫人员不良情绪的发生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore adverse emotional response and its influencing factors among frontline health workers during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic and to provide evidences for promoting the workers' mental health.
      Methods  Using random sampling, we conducted a self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey among 258 frontline health workers during COVID-19 epidemic (February 4 – 7, 2020) at 5 cities in Fujian province. A self-designed questionnaire on general information, the Psychological Questionnaire for Public Health Emergent Event (PQPHEE) and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) were adopted in the survey. Multivariate linear stepwise regression model and non-recursive path analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors for the participants′ emotional response.
      Results  Valid information were collected from all the participants. The domain scores of PQPHEE were 0.63 ± 0.49 for phobia, 0.24 ± 0.39 for depression, 0.22 ± 0.34 for hypochondria, 0.18 ± 0.32 for neurasthenia, and 0.10 ± 0.23 for obsessive anxiety; the domain scores of SCSQ were 1.20 ± 0.72 for positive problem-focused coping, 1.45 ± 0.82 for positive emotion-focused coping, 0.62 ± 0.57 for negative problem-focused coping, 0.75 ± 0.65 for negative emotion-focused coping, and 1.41 ± 1.01 for psychological counseling, respectively. The results of multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis revealed that the participants with poor self-protection and high negative problem-focused coping were more likely to have depression; the participants with poor self-protection, ever having close contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases, high negative emotion-focused coping and low positive problem-focused coping were more likely to have neurasthenia; the participants being female and with poor self-protection were more likely to have phobia; the participants with poor self-protection, high negative emotion-focused coping, and low positive emotion-focused coping were more likely to have obsessive anxiety; the participants being female, with poor self-protection, and ever having close contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases were more likely to have hypochondria. The non-recursive path analysis demonstrated that poor self-protection exerted impact on phobia (standardized totaldirect plus indirect effect indicator = 0.336), neurasthenia (0.354), depression (0.274), hypochondria (0.286), and obsessive anxiety (0.294). Negative emotion- and problem-focused coping were complete mediating factors for phobia and obsessive anxiety.
      Conclusion  Coping style moderates relationships between impact factors and emotional responses among frontline health workers engaged in the containment of coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic. Promoting self-protection and changing negative coping style could alleviate negative emotion of the frontline health workers.

     

/

返回文章
返回