高级检索
顾雯雯, 刘艳, 王骏, 车鑫仁, 江伟, 许玉洋, 杜渐, 张小平, 张学潮. 基层预防接种人员对脊髓灰质炎疫苗“2 + 2”免疫程序接受度及影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(3): 405-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128372
引用本文: 顾雯雯, 刘艳, 王骏, 车鑫仁, 江伟, 许玉洋, 杜渐, 张小平, 张学潮. 基层预防接种人员对脊髓灰质炎疫苗“2 + 2”免疫程序接受度及影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(3): 405-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128372
GU Wen-wen, LIU Yan, WANG Jun, . Acceptance of tow doses of IPV followed by two doses of bOPV vaccination schedule and its associates among immunization clinic staff in Hangzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(3): 405-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128372
Citation: GU Wen-wen, LIU Yan, WANG Jun, . Acceptance of tow doses of IPV followed by two doses of bOPV vaccination schedule and its associates among immunization clinic staff in Hangzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(3): 405-410. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128372

基层预防接种人员对脊髓灰质炎疫苗“2 + 2”免疫程序接受度及影响因素

Acceptance of tow doses of IPV followed by two doses of bOPV vaccination schedule and its associates among immunization clinic staff in Hangzhou city

  • 摘要:
      目的   调查浙江省杭州市基层预防接种人员对脊髓灰质炎疫苗“2 + 2”2剂次脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗(IPV)+ 2剂次二价脊髓灰质炎减毒活疫苗(bOPV)免疫程序接受度及其影响因素,为全国其他城市开展该程序提供参考。
      方法   本研究于2019年5 — 8月在杭州市所有接种门诊随机抽取2名预防接种相关工作人员,采用面对面问卷调查的形式,收集基本人口学特征、脊灰及脊灰疫苗相关知识得分(共14题)、脊灰疫苗“2 + 2”免疫程序接受度、开展脊灰疫苗“2 + 2”免疫程序中出现的问题以及提出的意见建议。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验分析影响知识得分的因素,用χ2和logistic回归分析影响接受度的因素。
      结果  在398名调查对象中,年龄中位数34(30~39)岁;男性占18.3 %(73人)。主城区接种医师和执业医师知识掌握度较好。≥ 40岁接种人员接受难度增加(OR = 2.286,95 % CI = 1.182~4.419)。认为接受难度增加的原因中,“家长不容易接受,解释工作较难”所占最多41.18 %(49/119)。36.68 %(146/398)的人提出了问题和困难,其中以“bOPV和IPV外包装相似”占最多20.55 %(30/146)。有10.80 %(43/398)对脊灰疫苗免疫程序提出了建议,“建议全程接种IPV”占比最多74.42 %(32/43)。
      结论   杭州市基层预防接接种人员对脊灰疫苗“2 + 2”免疫程序具有较好的认知和接受度。在实施脊灰疫苗“2 + 2”免疫程序时,要注重对大年龄段的接种医生的培训,包括脊灰疫苗接种操作、脊灰疫苗序贯程序、与其他疫苗接种排针的培训,另外还要通过不同途径加强对儿童家长的宣传力度,减轻接种医生的解释工作。另外建议厂家对bOPV和IPV采用不同的外包装,避免差错事故的发生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To examine the acceptance of “2 + 2” (2 doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine IPV followed by 2 doses of bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine bOPV) vaccination schedule and its influencing factors among immunization clinic staff in Hangzhou city and to provide references for implementing the vaccination schedule in other regions in China.
      Methods   During May – August 2019, we conducted a face-to-face survey among 398 medical staff in all immunization clinics (two staff randomly recruited in one of the 199 clinics) in Hangzhou city. A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect participants′ information on demographics, knowledge about poliomyelitis vaccine (14 questions), the acceptance of the “2 + 2” immunization schedule, impeding factors for implementation of the schedule and their countermeasures. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, chi-square test and the logistic regression model were used in data analysis.
      Results   The age of the participants ranged 30 – 39 years, with a median age of 34 years. The majority (81.7%) of the participants were female. The participants from the clinics in main urban regions had a better knowledge about poliomyelitis vaccine. The participants aged 40 years and above were less likely to accept the “2 + 2” immunization schedule (odds ratio = 2.286, 95% confidence interval: 1.182 – 4.419). Of the 119 participants considering an increased difficulty for the vaccination under the “2 + 2” immunization schedule, 41.18% contributed the difficulty to the disapproval from vaccinees′ parents and the difficulty for persuading the parents to accept the “2 + 2” schedule. Among all the participants, 36.68% (146/398) reported impeding factors for the implementation of the “2 + 2” immunization schedule; of them, 20.55% (30/146) affirmed similarity in outer packing of bOPV and IPV being a main impeding factor. There were 10.80% (43/398) of the participants suggesting some modifications in poliomyelitis vaccine immunization schedule and IPV-only schedule was proposed by 74.42% (32/43) of the suggesters.
      Conclusion   The rate of acceptance of and knowledge about “2 + 2” poliomyelitis vaccine immunization schedule are high among medical staff in immunization clinics in Hangzhou city. The related training programs among medical staff at elder age, the publicity for the new schedule among vaccinees′ parents, and indication in outer packing of bOPV and IPV need to be promoted for the implementation of the “2 + 2” schedule.

     

/

返回文章
返回