高级检索
陈霞, 吴星, 侯徐旭, 汪惠才. 新疆援鄂医护人员心理健康现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(5): 682-685. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128850
引用本文: 陈霞, 吴星, 侯徐旭, 汪惠才. 新疆援鄂医护人员心理健康现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(5): 682-685. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128850
Xia CHENG, Xing WU, Xu-xu HOU, . Mental health status among medical staff from Xinjiang during COVID-19 epidemic control in Hubei province: a cross-sectional survey[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(5): 682-685. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128850
Citation: Xia CHENG, Xing WU, Xu-xu HOU, . Mental health status among medical staff from Xinjiang during COVID-19 epidemic control in Hubei province: a cross-sectional survey[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(5): 682-685. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1128850

新疆援鄂医护人员心理健康现状分析

Mental health status among medical staff from Xinjiang during COVID-19 epidemic control in Hubei province: a cross-sectional survey

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析新疆援鄂抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎医护人员心理健康状况。
      方法  2020年1月28日 — 2月29日,新疆援鄂分三批次累计派出386名医护人员。研究以问卷星为载体,采用Zung氏焦虑自评量表(SAS)对调查对象的心理现状进行调查,并与中国常模对比分析。采用一般性统计描述、单因素分析、回归分析方法。
      结果  有效调查表361份,有效率93.5 %。新疆援鄂医护人员心理健康程度低于全国常模,主要心境障碍为焦虑,检出焦虑者共285人(78.95 %):轻度焦虑187人(51.80 %),中度焦虑87人(24.10 %),重度焦虑11人(3.05 %)。恐惧评分、隔离区累积工作时长、民族、是否进入隔离区、病房类别,是医护人员心理健康的影响因素(P < 0.05)。
      结论  隔离区环境是医护人员产生不同程度心理应激反应的主要原因,隔离区累计工作时长5~8 d者心理健康受影响程度较重,援鄂人员心理受疫情影响总体情况较轻。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To examine mental health status among medical staff from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang) during the containment of coronovirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in Huber province.
      Methods  From January 28 to February 29, 2020, we conducted a survey with Zung′s Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) via online platform among 386 medical staff dispatched by Xinjiang health administrative and engaged in front line work of COVID-19 in Hubei province. The SAS scores of the medical staff were analyzed and compared to those of national norms. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis and regression analysis were adopted in data analysis.
      Results  Among 361 valid respondents (93.5% of all participants), the overall SAS score was higher than that of national norm and 285 (78.95%) were detected with anxiety symptom, of them 187 (51.80%), 87 (24.10%), and 11 (3.05%) were assessed with mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. Significant impact factors of mental symptoms of the medical staff were fear score, cumulated duration for working in isolation region, nationality, whether working in isolation region, and the type of ward a staff working in (P < 0.05 for all).
      Conclusion  The mental symptoms are generally mild among the medical staff from Xinjiang during COVID-19 epidemic control in Huber province and mainly influence by whether working in an isolation region; the staff with the cumulated 5 – 8 days of working in an isolation region had more serious psychological stress reaction.

     

/

返回文章
返回