高级检索
谢朝梅, 覃平, 曾希鹏, 邓海斌, 程思杰, 谢燕湘. 新冠肺炎确诊病例血液标本IgM和IgG动态检测结果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(10): 1396-1398. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130146
引用本文: 谢朝梅, 覃平, 曾希鹏, 邓海斌, 程思杰, 谢燕湘. 新冠肺炎确诊病例血液标本IgM和IgG动态检测结果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2020, 36(10): 1396-1398. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130146
XIE Chao-mei, QIN Ping, ZENG Xi-peng, . Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG in confirmed COVID-19 cases: detection results analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(10): 1396-1398. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130146
Citation: XIE Chao-mei, QIN Ping, ZENG Xi-peng, . Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG in confirmed COVID-19 cases: detection results analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2020, 36(10): 1396-1398. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130146

新冠肺炎确诊病例血液标本IgM和IgG动态检测结果分析

Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG in confirmed COVID-19 cases: detection results analysis

  • 摘要:
      目的   分析49例新冠肺炎确诊病例不同时间段的114份血液标本IgM和IgG动态检测结果,为发现新冠病毒抗体的产生规律和特征,制定科学高效的防控策略提供依据。
      方法   收集湖南省常德市49例新冠肺炎确诊病例不同时间的血液标本114份,选择42份新冠病毒核酸检测阴性者血液标本作为对照,采用荧光免疫层析法分别检测新冠病毒IgM和IgG,分析抗体动态检测结果,并进行统计分析。
      结果   49例确诊病例114份血液标本中,检出IgM 96份,阳性率84.21 %,检出IgG 108份,阳性率94.74 %,两者阳性率比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两种抗体的浓度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),IgG高于IgM,IgM在不同时间段,抗体浓度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),IgG在不同时间段,抗体阳性率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);另外,重复采血的病例中,其核酸转阴时间与IgM、IgG转阳时间有密切关系,IgM、IgG转阳时间越短,核酸转阴时间也越短。
      结论   IgM和IgG检测是新冠肺炎核酸检测方法的有效补充,抗体的动态监测有助于进一步了解抗体产生的规律,对疫情的流行病学调查、患者的疗效观察和疫苗的研制具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze dynamic changes of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) in 49 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during various periods of the disease and to explore regulations and characteristics of antibodies production against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for providing evidences for effective prevention and control of COVID-19 epidemic.
      Methods  Totally 114 blood samples were collected from 49 viral nucleic acid detection-confirmed COVID-19 patients (one sample for 17 cases and 2 – 7 samples for 32 cases) and blood samples from another 49 viral nucleic acid negative cases were also collected as controls in Changde city, Hunan province between January 24 and February 22, 2020. Fluorescent immunochromatography was used to detect serum SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG and dynamic changes in IgM and IgG were statistically analyzed.
      Results  Of the 114 serum specimens from 49 viral nucleic acid positive cases, 96 (84.21%) were IgM positive and 108 (94.74%) were IgG positive, with a significant difference between the two positive rates (P < 0.05). The titer of IgG antibody was significantly higher than that of IgM (P < 0.05) and the titer of IgM was significantly different in the cases at various periods of the disease. The positive rate of IgG varied significantly among the patients at different periods of the disease (P < 0.05). In addition, the results of repeated detection demonstrated that there was a close positive correlation of positive conversion period of IgM and IgG with negative conversion period of viral nucleic acid.
      Conclusion  The detection of IgM and IgG is an effective supplement to the nucleic acid tesing for COVID-19. The dynamic monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody are of significance for COVID-19-related epidemiological survey, therapeutic effect evaluation, and vaccine development.

     

/

返回文章
返回