高级检索
张珊珊, 陈任, 赵然, 王丹妮, 秦侠, 胡志. 艾滋病防治领域社会组织内部社会资本分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(8): 1195-1200. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130596
引用本文: 张珊珊, 陈任, 赵然, 王丹妮, 秦侠, 胡志. 艾滋病防治领域社会组织内部社会资本分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(8): 1195-1200. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130596
ZHANG Shan-shan, CHEN Ren, ZHAO Ran, . Internal social capital for social organizations engaged in AIDS prevention and control in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(8): 1195-1200. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130596
Citation: ZHANG Shan-shan, CHEN Ren, ZHAO Ran, . Internal social capital for social organizations engaged in AIDS prevention and control in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(8): 1195-1200. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1130596

艾滋病防治领域社会组织内部社会资本分析

Internal social capital for social organizations engaged in AIDS prevention and control in China: a cross-sectional study

  • 摘要:
      目的  从中观社会资本的视角,分析艾滋病防治(以下简称艾防)领域社会组织内部社会资本要素、探讨组织内部社会资本的开发。
      方法  2015年8 — 10月,采用多阶段整群抽样方法,根据国家疫情报告选取8个样本省,每个省1~3个地市作为调查点,再整群抽取该地市范围内所有的社会组织作为研究对象,最终纳入的有效样本为212个。数据分析使用SPSS 18.0进行。
      结果  信任因子的影响因素为组织成立时间和服务对象种类数量;共同语言和愿景因子的影响因素为内部成员数量变化情况等;非正式网络因子的影响因素为组织工作领域种类等;正式网络因子的影响因素为组织成立时间等;支持因子的影响因素为服务对象数量、组织筹资渠道等。
      结论  当前我国艾防领域的社会组织内部存在一定的社会资本,但是高低流行区之间、社会资本因子之间、因子的具体条目之间存在差异。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze internal social capital elements of social organizations participating in AIDS prevention and control from the perspective of meso-social capital for promoting the development of internal social capital of relevant organizations.
      Methods  With multistage random cluster sampling and a self-designed questionnaire, we conducted a survey among 211 social organizations engaged in AIDS prevention and control in 18 municipalities/prefectures of 8 provinces with different AIDS epidemic intensity across China during August – October 2015. SPSS 18.0 was used in data analysis.
      Results  The results of univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that influencing factors for different internal social capital elements of social organizations included: (1) an organization′s establishment duration and the number of different types of target population for trust factor; (2) variation in the number of organization members for common language and vision; (3) item and number of AIDS prevention and control domains for informal network; (4) an organization′s establish-ment duration for formal network; and (5) the number of target population and funding resources for support factor.
      Conclusion  There is a certain amount of social capital within the social organizations engaged in AIDS prevention and control in China but the internal social capital differs by regional AIDS epidemic intensity, social capital factor, and specific factor item.

     

/

返回文章
返回