高级检索
卫薇, 田向阳, 王晓妍, 李方波. 某高校新生公共卫生安全意识、知识与技能调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(7): 1157-1160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1134397
引用本文: 卫薇, 田向阳, 王晓妍, 李方波. 某高校新生公共卫生安全意识、知识与技能调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(7): 1157-1160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1134397
WEI Wei, TIAN Xiang-yang, WANG Xiao-yan, . Public health and safety-related awareness, knowledge and skill among freshmen in a university[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(7): 1157-1160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1134397
Citation: WEI Wei, TIAN Xiang-yang, WANG Xiao-yan, . Public health and safety-related awareness, knowledge and skill among freshmen in a university[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(7): 1157-1160. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1134397

某高校新生公共卫生安全意识、知识与技能调查

Public health and safety-related awareness, knowledge and skill among freshmen in a university

  • 摘要:
      目的  了解某高校新生公共卫生安全意识、知识与技能现状,为在高校开展有针对性的公共卫生安全教育提供依据。
      方法  于2020年9 — 11月,在北京市某所全国招生的综合性大学抽取2020年入学的3204名本、硕、博新生,采用高校新生公共卫生安全意识、知识和技能调查表开展调查,采用SPSS 19.0进行统计分析。
      结果  调查对象信息甄别意识的回答正确率最低,为20.29 %(650/3204);其次为心理调适技能,回答正确率为52.68 %(1688/3204)。公共卫生安全意识得分(0.25 ± 0.32)分,知识得分(0.75 ± 0.21)分,技能得分(0.74 ± 0.26)分,总分(1.74 ± 0.52)分;48.85 %(1565/3204)的人具备公共卫生安全意识、知识与技能。女生的公共卫生安全技能得分(0.76 ± 0.25)高于男生(0.73 ± 0.26)(t = – 2.588,P = 0.010),而男生的知识得分(0.76 ± 0.20)高于女生(0.74 ± 0.21)(t = 2.710,P = 0.007),本科及以下学历学生总分相对较高(1.76 ± 0.50;t = 3.596,P = 0.028),城市学生具备公共卫生安全意识、知识和技能情况优于农村学生(OR = 1.405,95 % CI = 1.213~1.628)。
      结论  高校新生公共卫生安全意识、知识与技能处于中等水平,健康教育可有效提高学生的公共卫生安全素养。开展健康教育工作时,应注重信息甄别意识和心理调适技能的培养,同时注意区分不同性别、学历,并更多地关注农村地区学生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To examine current situation of awareness, knowledge and skills about public health and safety among freshmen in a university and to provide evidence for carrying out relevant education programs in the students.
      Methods   During September – November 2020, we conducted an online anonymous survey among 3 303 undergraduate, master and doctoral students entering a university in Beijing using a self-designed questionnaire on public health and safety-related awareness, knowledge and skill. SPSS 19.0 was used for statistical analysis.
      Results   For the 3 204 participants (97% of all responders) with valid information, the correct answer rate was the lowest (20.29%) for the discrimination on an information about infectious disease epidemic, followed by that (52.68%) for psychological adjustment skill. The participants′ mean scores were 0.25 ± 0.32 for the awareness on public health and safety (0.89 for the highest awareness), 0.75 ± 0.21 for relevant knowledge (0.94), and 0.74 ± 0.26 for relevant skill (1.02), respectively, with an overall score of 1.74 ± 0.52 in a scale with the full mark of 2.85; totally 48.85% of the participants had the overall score of ≥ 1.71 (60% of the full mark), indicating having public health and safety-related awareness, knowledge and skill. Compared to those of the male participants, the female participants had a significantly higher score for public health and safety skill (0.76 ± 0.25 vs. 0.73 ± 0.26; t = – 2.588, P = 0.010) but a lower score for relevant knowledge (0.74 ± 0.21 vs. 0.76 ± 0.20; t = 2.710, P = 0.007). The undergraduate participants had a higher overall score (1.76 ± 0.50; t = 3.596, P = 0.028). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the participants from urban regions were more likely to have public health and safety-related awareness, knowledge and skill (odds ratio = 1.405, 95% confidence interval: 1.213 – 1.628) in comparison to those from rural regions.
      Conclusion   The public health and safety-related awareness, knowledge and skill are at a moderate level but specific education programs, need to be promoted among university freshmen, especially on relevant information discrimination and psychological adjustment skill and in the freshmen from rural regions.

     

/

返回文章
返回