高级检索
宁宁, 郭杨, 钱瑜, 王璐, 吴群红. 灾难性医疗需求激增情境下卫生系统韧性概念内涵[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(2): 131-133. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135905
引用本文: 宁宁, 郭杨, 钱瑜, 王璐, 吴群红. 灾难性医疗需求激增情境下卫生系统韧性概念内涵[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(2): 131-133. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135905
NING Ning, GUO Yang, QIAN Yu, . Conceptual connotation of health system resilience in the context of catastrophic medical surge[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(2): 131-133. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135905
Citation: NING Ning, GUO Yang, QIAN Yu, . Conceptual connotation of health system resilience in the context of catastrophic medical surge[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(2): 131-133. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1135905

灾难性医疗需求激增情境下卫生系统韧性概念内涵

Conceptual connotation of health system resilience in the context of catastrophic medical surge

  • 摘要:
      目的  明确灾难性医疗需求激增情境下卫生系统韧性的概念内涵,为提高中国灾难风险管理能力提供参考依据。
      方法  检索2014年1月 — 2021年1月中国知网数据库和PubMed数据库中与卫生系统韧性概念相关的中英文文献,应用关键词分析法对卫生系统韧性概念内涵的主题词进行解析并形成概念内涵专家咨询问卷,采用网络函询的方式对来自全国卫生应急和灾害医学相关领域的31名专家进行咨询。
      结果  专家咨询的积极系数为81.6 %,权威系数为0.84,协调系数为0.383;专家对韧性作为复杂系统能力特质的认同程度评分为(4.84 ± 0.37)分,对韧性作为隐性能力特质的认同程度评分为(4.39 ± 0.76)分,对韧性内涵作为系统对干扰吸收、适应、转变能力的认同程度评分为(4.71 ± 0.46)分;对于卫生系统作为动态变化的复杂系统的认同程度评分为(4.77 ± 0.50)分,对于卫生系统韧性的吸收能力、适应能力、转化能力的认同程度评分分别为(4.29 ± 0.69)、(4.39 ± 0.80)、(3.97 ± 0.95)分。
      结论  灾难性医疗需求激增情境下卫生系统韧性是医疗卫生机构等系统主体呈现为动态变化的耗散结构,当遭受系统内外干扰时,能够及时有效吸收、适应、转变,并演化为新的稳定有序结构的能力。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To clarity conceptual connotation of health system resilience (HSR) in the context of catastrophic surge in medical demand and to provide references for improving disaster risk management in China.
      Methods  Through searching PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and other databases, totally 33 Chinese and English literatures published from January 2014 through January 2021 were retrieved using the key words including “health system resilience, “health system”, and “resilience”. An Delphi consultation was then conducted among 31 domestic experts and scholars engaged in health emergency management and disaster medicine using a self-designed questionnaire based on analyses on subject words relevant to conceptual connotation of HSR.
      Results  The coefficients were 81.6%, 0.84, and 0.383 for the consultation′s positivity, authority, and coordination. Towards to the connotation of resilience of a complex system, the experts′ grading scores were 4.84 ± 0.37 for the recognition on the resilience as a capability trait, 4.39 ± 0.76 for as a tacit capability trait, and 4.71 ± 0.46 for as a capability of interference absorption, adaptation, and transformation. The experts′ grading score was 4.77 ± 0.50 for the recognition on a health system as a dynamically changing complex system; towards to the connotation of a health system′s resilience, the experts′ grading scores were 4.29 ± 0.69, 4.39 ± 0.80, and 3.97 ± 0.95 for the recognition on the resilience as a capability of interference absorption, adaptation, and transformation, respectively.
      Conclusion  The health system resilience in the context of a catastrophic surge in medical demand could be defined as a health system′s capability of interference absorption, adaptation, and transformation against internal and external adverse impact considering the system′s dissipative structure with its main subjects such as medical and health institutions in dynamic changes.

     

/

返回文章
返回