高级检索
祁玉成, 施培武, 沈群红, 张朝阳, 陈政, 蒲川, 徐凌忠, 胡志, 马安宁, 龚朝晖, 徐天强, 王磐石, 汪华, 郝超, 李程跃, 周庆誉, 郝模. 中国长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供能力现状及其发展均衡程度分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(11): 1465-1468. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1137731
引用本文: 祁玉成, 施培武, 沈群红, 张朝阳, 陈政, 蒲川, 徐凌忠, 胡志, 马安宁, 龚朝晖, 徐天强, 王磐石, 汪华, 郝超, 李程跃, 周庆誉, 郝模. 中国长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供能力现状及其发展均衡程度分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(11): 1465-1468. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1137731
QI Yu-cheng, SHI Pei-wu, SHEN Qun-hong, . Situation and development balance of major chronic disease service provision in the Yangtze River Delta of China: a literature- and coupling coordination degree model-based analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(11): 1465-1468. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1137731
Citation: QI Yu-cheng, SHI Pei-wu, SHEN Qun-hong, . Situation and development balance of major chronic disease service provision in the Yangtze River Delta of China: a literature- and coupling coordination degree model-based analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(11): 1465-1468. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1137731

中国长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供能力现状及其发展均衡程度分析

Situation and development balance of major chronic disease service provision in the Yangtze River Delta of China: a literature- and coupling coordination degree model-based analysis

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析中国长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供能力现状及其发展的均衡程度,为促进长三角区域重点慢性病预防控制能力建设高质量均衡发展提供参考依据。
      方法  收集2009年1月1日 — 2019年12月31日长三角区域有关重点慢性病的公开文件资料,借鉴适宜公共健康体系中“服务功能”要素,构建服务提供种类覆盖率(SCR)和定量可考核服务种类覆盖率(ASCR)2个指标定量分析长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供能力,并基于耦合协调度模型分析长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供能力发展的均衡程度。
      结果  中国长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供水平方面,SCR和ASCR平均值分别从2009年的21.2 %和10.0 %提升到2019年的82.8 %和51.5 %;从各级预防角度看,SCR和ASCR均以三级预防表现最好;从三级预防整体看,2019年上海市SCR覆盖率最高(96.0 %),安徽省SCR覆盖率最低(71.0 %),江苏省ASCR覆盖率最高(63.9 %),浙江省ASCR覆盖率最低(33.0 %);在长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供发展均衡水平方面,SCR和ASCR的耦合协调度值分别从2009年的38.97和11.58上升到2019年的90.73和70.72;2019年长三角区域SCR一级预防、二级预防和三级预防均衡等级分别为9级、9级和10级,ASCR分别为7级、7级和8级。
      结论  中国长三角区域重点慢性病服务提供能力及均衡水平逐年上升,三级预防优于一级和二级预防,SCR各级预防均衡发展水平优于ASCR。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze the status quo and balanced development of major chronic disease service provision capabilities in the Yangtze River Delta region of China, and to provide a reference for promoting high-quality and balanced development of major chronic disease prevention and control capabilities in the region.
      Methods  We retrieved documents on prevention and control of major chronic diseases published by local administrations in the Yangtze River Delta region (including Shanghai municipality and three provinces of Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Anhui) during the period from January 2009 through December 2019. Taking a page from service provision elements for an appropriate public health system, service coverage rate (SCR) and assessable service coverage rate (ASCR) were constructed for quantitative analysis on major chronic disease service provision capability of the municipality and the three provinces in the region. Coupling coordination degree model was adopted to assess the balance of the service provision capacity development in the Yangtze River Delta region.
      Results  The overall SCR and ASCR of major chronic disease service provision for the Yangtze River Delta region increased from 21.2% and 10.0% in 2009 to 82.8% and 51.5% in 2019. In the year of 2019, the prevention level-specific SCR and ASCR were the highest for tertiary prevention; the administrative division-specific SCR of tertiary prevention was the highest (96.0%) for Shanghai municipality and the lowest (71.0%) for Anhui province, while, the administrative division-specific ASCR of tertiary prevention was the highest (71.0%) for Jiangsu province and the lowest (33.0%) for Zhejiang province. The overall index value for coupling coordination degree of SCR and ASCR of the Yangtze River Delta region increased from 38.97 and 11.58 in 2009 to 90. 73 and 70.72 in 2019; the overall scores of 2019 for the balance of SCR of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention in the region were 9, 9 and 10, and the overall scores for the balance of ASCR were 7, 7 and 8 respectively.
      Conclusion  In the Yangtze River Delta region during the period of 2009 – 2019, the major chronic disease service provision capacity and the balance for the capacity development increased yearly; the service provision capacity was higher for tertiary prevention than that for primary and secondary prevention and the development balance was higher for SCR than that for ASCR.

     

/

返回文章
返回