高级检索
李盛丰, 赵姣, 钟名华, 夏国亮, 邓灵福, 张筱丽, 冯莹颖, 罗勤. 单增李斯特菌不同PCR快速检测方法比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2008, 24(8): 1021-1023. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2008-24-08-67
引用本文: 李盛丰, 赵姣, 钟名华, 夏国亮, 邓灵福, 张筱丽, 冯莹颖, 罗勤. 单增李斯特菌不同PCR快速检测方法比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2008, 24(8): 1021-1023. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2008-24-08-67
LI Sheng-feng, ZHAO Jiao, ZHONG Ming-hua, . Comparison of three rapid PCR methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2008, 24(8): 1021-1023. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2008-24-08-67
Citation: LI Sheng-feng, ZHAO Jiao, ZHONG Ming-hua, . Comparison of three rapid PCR methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2008, 24(8): 1021-1023. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2008-24-08-67

单增李斯特菌不同PCR快速检测方法比较

Comparison of three rapid PCR methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes

  • 摘要: 目的比较3种PCR快速检测方法在检测单核细胞增生李斯特菌时的特异性和灵敏度方面的差异。方法针对单核细胞增生李斯特菌的毒力基因iapprfA基因,分别设计引物,进行单个PCR、多重PCR、套式PCR等3种方法检测。结果3种PCR方法均具有较强的特异性;套式PCR的灵敏度为102cfu/ml,高于单个PCR(103cfu/ml)和多重PCR(104cfu/ml)。结论多重PCR在特异性检测方面具有优势,而在灵敏度方面,套式PCR要明显优于单个及多重PCR方法。

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the differences among the three fast-detect PCR methods in their specificity and sensitivity for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes(LM).MethodsBased on the sequence of LM virulence geneiap and prfA,five pairs of primers were designed for each of the three PCR.ResultsAll the primers showed high specificity.The sensitivity of the nested-PCR got as high as 102 cfu/ml,which was more sensitive than the single-PCR(103 cfu/ml)and the multiplex-PCR(104 cfu/ml).ConclusionMultiplex-PCR has more advantages in specificity.However,nested-PCR was more sensitive than single-PCR and multiplex-PCR obviously.Therefore,the primary health and quarantine departments should choose a suitable method according to their situations and the purpose of supervision work.

     

/

返回文章
返回