高级检索
徐继英, 梁伯衡, 谢帆, 李新建, 姚海宏, 李强, 姜垣, 杨焱, 冯国泽, 焦淑芳, 李恂, 朱国平. 中国6城市低焦油香烟吸食者认知及影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2009, 25(10): 1180-1182. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-15
引用本文: 徐继英, 梁伯衡, 谢帆, 李新建, 姚海宏, 李强, 姜垣, 杨焱, 冯国泽, 焦淑芳, 李恂, 朱国平. 中国6城市低焦油香烟吸食者认知及影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2009, 25(10): 1180-1182. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-15
XU Ji-ying, LIANG Bo-heng, XIE Fan, . Health consciousness and its influential factors among "low-tar" cigarette smokers in six cities of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2009, 25(10): 1180-1182. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-15
Citation: XU Ji-ying, LIANG Bo-heng, XIE Fan, . Health consciousness and its influential factors among "low-tar" cigarette smokers in six cities of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2009, 25(10): 1180-1182. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-15

中国6城市低焦油香烟吸食者认知及影响因素

Health consciousness and its influential factors among "low-tar" cigarette smokers in six cities of China

  • 摘要: 目的了解北京、沈阳、上海、长沙、广州和银川6城市吸烟者中低焦油香烟吸食者的认知情况及影响因素,为防治工作提供依据。方法使用多阶段抽样法在6城市中抽取4817名吸烟者,调查其低焦油香烟吸食情况及相关认知,使用多变量Logistic回归分析吸烟者吸食低焦油香烟的影响因素。结果成年吸烟者中54.2%吸食低焦油香烟,45.8%吸食普通卷烟;普通卷烟和低焦油香烟吸食者中认为吸烟对健康没有好处分别占82.9%,80.6%,戒掉低焦油香烟比较容易分别占44.1%,40.5%,有戒烟意愿分别占27.5%,22.3%,很担心吸烟会损害今后健康分别占21.7%,15.6%,对吸烟总体看法很不好或不好分别占57.1%,50.5%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);6城市间低焦油香烟的吸食比例差异较大,分别为北京60.1%、沈阳56.5%、上海41.2%、长沙90.0%、广州28.1%和银川60.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素分析结果显示,吸烟者选择低焦油香烟的影响因素为城市、健康意识、戒烟意愿。结论6城市中吸食低焦油香烟的比例差异较大,具备健康意识、戒烟意愿的人群更有可能吸食低焦油香烟。

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo collect information of adult smokers using "low tar" cigarette in Beijing,Shenyang,Shanghai, Changsha,Guangzhou and Yinchuan,and figure out relative influential factors.MethodsWith multiple stage sampling method, 4817 adult smokers were selected and surveyed with face to face interview to collect information of "low-tar" cigarette consumption and relative health consciousness.Data were analyzed with logistic regression to find out influential factors.ResultsThe ratio of smokers reported using "low tar"cigarette was 54.2% in six cities.Compared with regular cigarettes users,"low-tar" cigarette users had significant higher percentages for considerations of "Smoking is not good for health"(82.9% vs 80.6%), "Low-tar cigarettes make it easier to quit smoking(44.1% vs 40.5%)","having plan to quit smoking(27.5% vs 22.3%)", "worrying about smoking will damage health in the future(21.7% vs 15.6%)" and "Smoking is bad or very bad(57.1% vs 50.5%)".There were significant differences in the rate of using low-tar cigarette bewteen six cities.The result of logistic regression analysis showed that different cities,health consc iousness andintention to quit smoking were associated with the behavior of using "low tar"cigarette.ConclusionThere are differences in the rate of using low-tar cigarettes between six cities in China.Health consciousness and the intention to quit smoking are associated with the probability of using "low tar" cigarette.

     

/

返回文章
返回