高级检索
吴翠平, 娄晓民, 梁利花, 戈文洋, 季士治, 游新. 农村校外青少年艾滋病不同干预方法效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2010, 26(12): 1477-1478. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-12-03
引用本文: 吴翠平, 娄晓民, 梁利花, 戈文洋, 季士治, 游新. 农村校外青少年艾滋病不同干预方法效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2010, 26(12): 1477-1478. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-12-03
WU Cui-ping, LOU Xiao-min, LIANG Li-hua, . Evaluation on effect of different interventions on AIDS in rural adolescents out of school[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2010, 26(12): 1477-1478. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-12-03
Citation: WU Cui-ping, LOU Xiao-min, LIANG Li-hua, . Evaluation on effect of different interventions on AIDS in rural adolescents out of school[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2010, 26(12): 1477-1478. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2010-26-12-03

农村校外青少年艾滋病不同干预方法效果评价

Evaluation on effect of different interventions on AIDS in rural adolescents out of school

  • 摘要: 目的探讨提高农村校外青少年艾滋病知识水平的有效干预方法。方法选取河南省2个县13~18岁430名农村校外青少年为研究对象,采用不同健康教育方式干预,在干预前、后进行问卷调查以评价干预效果。结果干预前后校外青少年艾滋病相关知识平均知晓率分别为47.09%和85.22%,蚊虫叮咬不会传染艾滋病知晓率分别为21.9%和87.1%,与艾滋病病人共餐不传染艾滋病知晓率分别为28.4%和81.0%;不同方法干预后艾滋病知识得分均高于干预前(P<0.001);不同干预方法比较差异有统计学意义(F=2.140,P<0.05);综合干预、同伴教育和专题讲座3组平均得分提高值较明显,分别为45.72,42.33和35.56分。结论本研究中采用的干预方法均能提高校外青少年艾滋病知识水平,综合干预、同伴教育和专题讲座干预效果较好。

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the effective interventions on AIDS among rural adolescents out of school.MethodsTo tally 430 adolescents out of school and a tage of 13-18 years were selected.Different AIDS health education interven tions were adopted and their effects were assessed with questionnaire of knowledge on AIDS before and after the intervention anonymously.ResultsThe average awareness rates of AIDS-related knowledge in the adolescents before and after interventions were 47.09% and 85.22%,respectively.The awarenessrates of the question'HIV could not spread from person to person by a mosquito bite' before and after the interventions were 21.9% and 87.1%.The knowledge rates of question ‘HIVcould not spread through eating at the same tablewith AIDS patients' before and after interventions were 28.4% and 81.0%.All of the interventions could increase the scores of questions of AIDS related knowledge.There were significant differences among the different intervention groups(F=2.140,P<0.05).The mean scores increased for comprehensive intervention,peer education and lecture intervention were 45.72,42.33,and 35.56,respectively.ConclusionAll the interventions used in the study could improve out-of-school adole scents' AIDS related knowledge.The effective methods are comprehensive intervention,peer education and lecture intervention.

     

/

返回文章
返回