高级检索
韦琳, 王萍, 覃彦香. 柳州市青少年健康危险行为聚集模式分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(6): 737-740. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-26
引用本文: 韦琳, 王萍, 覃彦香. 柳州市青少年健康危险行为聚集模式分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(6): 737-740. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-26
WEI Lin, WANG Ping, QIN Yan-xiang. Cluster of health-risk behaviors in adolescents in Liuzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(6): 737-740. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-26
Citation: WEI Lin, WANG Ping, QIN Yan-xiang. Cluster of health-risk behaviors in adolescents in Liuzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(6): 737-740. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-06-26

柳州市青少年健康危险行为聚集模式分析

Cluster of health-risk behaviors in adolescents in Liuzhou city

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨广西柳州市青少年健康危险行为聚集模式及特点.方法 采用分层整群抽样方法,于2009年抽取柳州市区3 720名大中学生进行问卷调查,采用样本聚类方法对12种健康危险行为进行聚类分析.结果 男女生行为聚集模式分为5组:低危险组男生构成比为34.79%,女生构成比为38.59%;骑车违规高发的中度危险组男生构成比为19.37%,女生构成比为25.65%;饮酒高发的中度危险组男生构成比为27.38%,女生构成比为18.03%;较高危险组男生构成比为9.56%,女生构成比为10.60%;高危险组男生构成比为8.91%,女生构成比为7.13%;男、女生骑车违规高发的中度危险组行为聚集现象不明显,饮酒高发的中度危险组与赌博等行为聚集,较高危险组男生打架、女生焦虑发生率最高,为100%,高危险组男女生均呈现外显行为和内隐行为高度聚集现象;吸烟是女生高危险组的标志性行为,是男生较高危险组、高危险组的标志性行为.结论 青少年健康危险行为聚集方式多样,应分别针对男、女生行为聚集特征,分级采取综合干预策略.

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the cluster pattern of health risk behaviors among college and middle school students in Liuzhou city of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.Methods Totally 3 720 students from colleges and middle schools in Liuzhou city were selected with stratified cluster sampling and surveyed with a questionnaire to collect information on 12 health risk behaviors.The data of male and female students were analyzed separately with cluster analysis.Results Five distinct groups were identified for both female and male:lowrisk group(34.79% of male and 38.59% of female),moderate risk groups(group 2:19.37% of male and 25.65% of female,group 3:27.38% of male and 18.03% of female),higher risk group(9.56% of male and 10.60% of female),and the highest risk group(8.91% of male and 7.13% of female).The rate of bicycle ride violation was the highest in group 2 of moderate risk group for both male and female.The rate of physical fight was the highest in higher risk group for male and the rate of anxiety was the highest for female.Smoking was a singnal behavior of the highest risk group.Conclusion The comprehensive measures of intervention should be sensitive to the unique needs of female and male adolescents.More specific prevention measure based on particular behavior or combinations of behaviors may be more effective.

     

/

返回文章
返回