高级检索
李艳兰. 大学生自杀意念与A型人格及防御方式关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(9): 1075-1076. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-09-02
引用本文: 李艳兰. 大学生自杀意念与A型人格及防御方式关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(9): 1075-1076. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-09-02
LI Yan-lan. Type A personality, defense style and suicidal ideation among undergraduates[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(9): 1075-1076. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-09-02
Citation: LI Yan-lan. Type A personality, defense style and suicidal ideation among undergraduates[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2011, 27(9): 1075-1076. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2011-27-09-02

大学生自杀意念与A型人格及防御方式关系

Type A personality, defense style and suicidal ideation among undergraduates

  • 摘要: 目的探讨大学生自杀意念、A型人格和防御方式特点及关系。方法整群抽取江西某高校406名大学生,采用自杀意念自评量表(SIOSS)、A型行为类型问卷和防御方式问卷(DSQ)进行调查。结果11.8%的大学生存在自杀意念;有自杀意念组A型行为发生率为54.2%,高于无自杀意念组的19.0%,差异有统计学意义;有自杀意念组在时间匆忙感、竞争敌意、A型人格总分、不成熟防御机制、中间防御机制上得分〔(15.81±3.4)、(13.65±3.09)、(29.46±5.63)、(4.91±1.00)、(4.66±0.53)〕高于无自杀意念组〔(11.72±3.56)、(11.83±3.40)、(23.54±6.03)、(3.80±0.76)、(4.43±0.60)〕,在成熟防御机制(5.30±1.02)上低于无自杀意念组(5.61±0.85)(P<0.05),差异均有统计学意义;时间匆忙感、竞争敌意、不成熟防御机制、成熟防御机制对自杀意念各因子及总分有预测作用。结论大学生自杀意念受A型人格及防御方式的影响。

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between type A personality,defense style and suicidal ideation among undergraduates.MethodsTotally 406 undergraduates in Jiangxi province were investigated with Self-rating Idea of Suicide Scale(SIOSS),Type A Behavior Pattern Scale and Defense Style Questionnaire(DSQ).ResultsOf the undergraduates investigated,11.8% had suicidal ideation.The ratio of type A personality for the student reporting suicidal ideation was 54.2%,which was significantly higher than that of students without suicidal ideation(19.0%).Compared with those of the students without suicidal ideation,the students with suicidal ideation had significantly higher scores in time hurry (15.81±3.46 vs 11.72±3.56),competitive hostility(13.65±3.09 vs 11.83±3.40),total scoce of type A personality (29.46±5.63 vs 23.54±6.03),immature defence style(4.91±1.00 vs 3.80±0.76),and intermediate defence style (4.66±0.53 vs 4.43±0.60),but lower score in the mature defense style(P<0.05 for all).ConclusionType A personality and defense style have significant influences on suicidal ideation among undergraduates.

     

/

返回文章
返回