高级检索
花静, 耿福海, 许建明, 曹萌, 张磊, 李洁, 郑雷军, 周伟东. 细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价量表编制及评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(3): 408-412. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-03-34
引用本文: 花静, 耿福海, 许建明, 曹萌, 张磊, 李洁, 郑雷军, 周伟东. 细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价量表编制及评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(3): 408-412. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-03-34
HUA Jing, GENG Fu-hai, XU Jian-ming.et al, . Validity and reliability of an assessment scale for bacteria food poisoning alarming service[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(3): 408-412. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-03-34
Citation: HUA Jing, GENG Fu-hai, XU Jian-ming.et al, . Validity and reliability of an assessment scale for bacteria food poisoning alarming service[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(3): 408-412. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-03-34

细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价量表编制及评价

Validity and reliability of an assessment scale for bacteria food poisoning alarming service

  • 摘要: 目的初步编制细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价量表,评价其信度和效度。方法在文献资料分析法、访谈法和小组讨论法基础上初步确定细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价量表的理论结构,运用探索性因素分析、主成分分析和信效度检验方法对上海市9个重点商圈或公共场所偶遇的428人对细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价情况进行了分析,验证该量表理论结构的合理性。结果通过文献资料分析法、访谈法和小组讨论法,确定细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价量表由服务可及性、服务关注满意度、服务依从性和服务效果效益4个维度13个条目组成;该量表的折半系数和Cronbach's α系数分别为0.599和0.827,去除条目1(细菌性食物中毒预警信息的渠道)后,其他12个条目Cronbach's α系数为0.837,12个条目与量表的相关系数为0.413~0.584,均>0.4,提示去除该条目后量表信度有提高;13个条目的项目水平内容效度指数为0.81~1.00,均>0.80,平均内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.92,提示该量表的内容效度较好;探索性因子分析结果表明,13个条目提取出服务的渠道、服务时效\满意度\依从性和服务效果效益3个因子,累积方差贡献率为56.766%;验证性因素分析结果表明,去除条目1后,其他12个条目拟合的最终模型由服务质量和服务效果效益2个高阶因子组成,其中服务质量包括服务可及性(2个条目)、服务关注满意度(3个条目)和服务依从性(3个条目)3个因子8个条目,服务效果效益包括服务效果效益1个因子4个条目,各条目因子载荷均>0.3,拟合指标χ2=181.685,df=50,χ2/df=3.634,GFI=0.920,AGFI=0.889,NFI=0.918,CFI=0.881,RMSEA=0.049,该模型拟合较好。结论初步完成细菌性食物中毒预警服务评价量表的编制,且验证性分析证明该量表具有好的信度和效度。

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess the validity and reliability of the assessment scale for bacteria food poisoning alarming and to provide valid and reliable tools for assessing bacteria food poisoning alarming service in Shanghai city.MethodsTotally 438 valid answers to a self-designed assessment scale for bacteria food poisoning alarming were collected in a cross-sectional survey with convenience sampling.The test-retest reliability,internal consistent reliability,content validity,and construct validity of the scale were assessed using Cronbach α coefficient,split-half coefficient,item-level content validity index(I-CVI),and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA).ResultsThe total Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0.827.The split half coefficient was 0.521.The range of I-CVI for 13 items of the scale were 0.81-1.00,with an average I-CVI of 0.92.The initial model of confirmatory fix index(CFI) was constructed according to the logical framework approach and the results of exploratory factor analysis.The results of construct validity analyses showed that the goodness of fit for final CFA model was fair(χ2/df=3.643.goodness-of-fit index GFI=0.920,average goodness-fit index AGFI=0.889,normed fit index NFI=0.918,CFI=0.8819,and root mean square error of aproximation RMSEA=0.049).The factor loadings were all above 0.3,with statistical significance.ConclusionThe results showed that the internal consistent reliability,content validity,and construct validity of the assessment scale on bacteria food poisoning alarming were fair and met the basic psychometric demands.The adjusted scale(12 items) could be used as a quantitative tool to assess bacteria food poisoning alarming in Shanghai city.

     

/

返回文章
返回