高级检索
郭玉芳, 张娜, 张静平. 农村与城镇生源护生积极心理品质及影响因素比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(7): 1041-1045. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-07-33
引用本文: 郭玉芳, 张娜, 张静平. 农村与城镇生源护生积极心理品质及影响因素比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(7): 1041-1045. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-07-33
GUO Yu-fang, ZHANG Na, ZHANG Jing-ping. Comparation of positive psychological quality and its influencing factors among nursing students from rural and urban areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(7): 1041-1045. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-07-33
Citation: GUO Yu-fang, ZHANG Na, ZHANG Jing-ping. Comparation of positive psychological quality and its influencing factors among nursing students from rural and urban areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(7): 1041-1045. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-07-33

农村与城镇生源护生积极心理品质及影响因素比较

Comparation of positive psychological quality and its influencing factors among nursing students from rural and urban areas

  • 摘要: 目的分析湖南省长沙市不同生源地护生积极心理品质及其影响因素的差异,为各高等护理院校制定有针对性的心理指导措施提供理论依据。方法采用随机整群抽样方法,抽取长沙市745名护生应用自编一般情况调查表、中国大学生积极心理品质量表、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、一般自我效能感量表(GSES)进行基本信息、积极心理品质、焦虑、抑郁及自我效能的现状调查。结果 湖南省长沙市农村生源护生在认知、人际、公正、超越4个维度和创造力、好奇心、思维与洞察力、热情、社交智慧、领导能力、希望信念、幽默风趣8项积极心理品质得分均低于城镇生源护生(P<0.05);农村与城镇生源护生焦虑发生率分别为20.35%(94/462)、25.08%(71/283),抑郁发生率分别为43.51%(201/462)、45.23%(128/283),自我效能平均分分别为(2.39±0.45)、(2.42±0.51)分,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);多因素分析表明,自我效能感、老师的关注、体育参与度、对积极心理品质的了解、抑郁、父母的期待和与同学的关系是农村和城镇生源护生积极心理品质的共同影响因素(均P<0.05),是否学生干部和父亲的关心是农村生源护生积极心理品质的影响因素(均P<0.05);焦虑、学习成绩、母亲的关心和表扬鼓励是城镇生源护生积极心理品质的影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论 不同生源地护生积极心理品质及其影响因素存在差异,应有针对性的培养护生的积极心理品质,促进其身心健康发展。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze the difference in positive psychological quality and its influencing factors among nursing students from rural and urban areas and to provide theoretical basis for formulating effective measures to improve psychological and physical health of nursing students.Methods Totally 745 nursing students were selected via random clustered sampling.General Information Questionnaire,Positive Psychological Questionnaire,Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS),and General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES) were used to collect information on general status,positive psychological quality,anxiety,depression,and self-efficacy among the nursing students.Results The scores of nursing students who came from rural areas were lower than those who came from urban areas in four dimensions and eight qualities(P<0.05 for all).The rates of anxiety and depression were 20.35% and 43.51% for rural students and 25.08% and 45.23% for urban students;the score of self-efficacy was 2.39±0.45 for rural students and 2.42±0.51 for urban students.There were no significant differences in anxiety,depression,and self-efficacy between the two groups(P>0.05).Multiple linear regression showed that self-efficacy,depression,parents' expectation,sports participation and the relationship with classmates were major factors influencing psychological qualities of the students(P<0.05);father's concern and whether being a student leader influenced the psychological qualities of the students who came from rural areas(P<0.05 for all);while anxiety,academic performance,mother's care influenced the the qualities of the students who came from urban areas(P<0.05 for all).Conclusion The positive psychological quality of nursing students from rural areas is worse than those from urban areas,and there are different influencing factors for the quality in the studensts.Effective measures should be taken to promote the positive qualities in nursing students based on different influencing factors for the quality.

     

/

返回文章
返回