高级检索
胡春梅, 何华敏, 何利. 公务员生存质量、工作家庭冲突与应对方式关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(8): 1224-1227. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-08-41
引用本文: 胡春梅, 何华敏, 何利. 公务员生存质量、工作家庭冲突与应对方式关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(8): 1224-1227. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-08-41
HU Chun-mei, HE Hua-min, HE Li. Assciation of quality of life with work-family conflict and coping style among civil servans[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(8): 1224-1227. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-08-41
Citation: HU Chun-mei, HE Hua-min, HE Li. Assciation of quality of life with work-family conflict and coping style among civil servans[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(8): 1224-1227. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-08-41

公务员生存质量、工作家庭冲突与应对方式关系

Assciation of quality of life with work-family conflict and coping style among civil servans

  • 摘要: 目的了解公务员生存质量现状及与工作家庭冲突、应对方式的关系。方法采用生存质量感量表、工作家庭冲突量表(WFC)及应对方式量表对在重庆市永川区分层随机抽取的514名公务员进行问卷调查。结果公务员生存质量感总分及生理、心理、环境、社会关系4个领域得分分别为(3.17±0.91)、(3.13±2.40)、(3.08±2.17)、(2.97±2.69)、(3.14±1.26)分;工作家庭冲突总分及工作时间对家庭的影响(TWIF)、工作压力对家庭的影响(SWIF)、工作行为对家庭的影响(BWIF)、家庭时间对工作的影响(TFIW)、家庭压力对工作的影响(SFIW)、家庭行为对工作的影响(BFIW)因子得分分别为(3.01±1.69)、(3.06±1.68)、(3.02±1.67)、(2.88±1.54)、(2.99±1.74)、(3.05±1.86)、(3.05±1.54)分;应对方式总分及积极应对、消极应对维度得分分别为(2.61±0.29)、(2.67±0.26)、(2.54±0.30)分;生存质量感总分与工作家庭冲突总分及其各维度(除TWIF外)均呈负相关(P<0.05),与应对方式总分及其各维度均呈正相关(P<0.05);积极应对、消极应对、SWIF对生存质量感具有预测作用。结论公务员生存质量感为中等水平,工作家庭冲突和应对方式对生存质量感有影响,应对方式和SWIF可预测公务员生存质量感。

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between the quality of life and work-family conflict and coping style. MethodsTotally 514 civil servants completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument,Short Form(WHOQOL-BREF),work-family conflict scale,and coping style scale. ResultsAmong the civil servants,the average score was 3.17±0.91 for total quality of life,3.13±2.40 for physical dimension,3.08±2.17 for psycholoical dimension,2.97±2.69 for enviroment,and 3.14±1.26 for social relationship;the factor score was 3.01±1.69 for overall work-family conflict(WFC),3.06±0.18 for time-based work-interference-work(TWIF),3.02±1.67 for stress-based work-interference-family(SWIF),2.88±1.54 for bahavior-based work-interference-family(BWIF),2.99±1.74 for time-based family-interference-work(TFIW),3.05±1.86 for stress-based family-interference-family,and 3.05±1.54 for behavior-based family-interference-work(BFIW),respectirely.The score for general coping style,positive coping,and negative coping was 2.61±0.29,2.67±0.26,and 2.54±0.30.The total score of quality of life was inversely correlated to all dimensions of work-family conflict(P<0.05 for all),except for TWIF.The overall score of coping style was positively correlated to all dimensions of quality of life scone(P<0.05).Positive coping,negative coping and SWIF were predictors of quality of life. ConclusionThe quality of life of civil servants is at moderate level.Work-family conflict and coping style can influence the quality of life and coping style and SWIF are predicting factors of quality of life among civil servants.

     

/

返回文章
返回