高级检索
张淼. 新疆维吾尔族警察16PF常模建立[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(10): 1433-1437. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-09
引用本文: 张淼. 新疆维吾尔族警察16PF常模建立[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(10): 1433-1437. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-09
ZHANG Miao. Establishment of norm for 16PF among Uighur police in Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(10): 1433-1437. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-09
Citation: ZHANG Miao. Establishment of norm for 16PF among Uighur police in Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(10): 1433-1437. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-09

新疆维吾尔族警察16PF常模建立

Establishment of norm for 16PF among Uighur police in Xinjiang

  • 摘要: 目的检验维语版卡特尔16种人格因素问卷(16PF)在新疆维吾尔族警察中的信度和效度,建立16PF维吾尔族警察常模,分析其性别、文化程度和警种特征。方法将中文版16PF翻译成维语版,采用分层随机抽样方法在新疆维吾尔自治区15个地州分别抽取218、172和3 817名维吾尔族警察进行了预测、重测和实试,分析该问卷的信度和效度,建立新疆维吾尔族警察人格常模,并比较不同性别、文化程度和警种差异。结果维语版16PF各项目与总分的相关分析表明,绝大多数条目与总分的相关系数在0.415~0.689(P<0.01),该问卷具有较好的区分度;该问卷总的内部一致性系数为0.827,分半信度为0.782,重测信度为0.600,该问卷具有较好的信度;效度检验时,各人格因素均能有效地反映出其所属因素,16种人格因素间的相关系数均较低,在-0.375~0.459,且每一因素均独立于其他因素,该问卷具有较好的效度;不同性别、文化程度、警种维吾尔族警察常模得分比较,不同性别警察在乐群性、聪慧性、恃强性、兴奋性、有恒性、敢为性、忧虑性、实验性、独立性、紧张性人格中差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),不同文化程度警察在乐群性、聪慧性、稳定性、敢为性、怀疑性、幻想性、实验性、独立性、紧张性人格中差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),不同警种警察在乐群性、恃强性、兴奋性、幻想性人格中差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论维语版16PF在新疆维吾尔族警察中具有较好的信度、效度和项目区分度;维吾尔族警察16PF常模样本存在性别、文化程度和警种差异。

     

    Abstract: Objective To establish the norm of Cattell's of 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire(16PF)of Uygur Version and to assess the reliability and validity of the 16PF among Uighur police.Methods The 16PF of Chinese version was translated into Uygur version.Using stratified random sampling method,218,172,and 3 817 Uygur police were selected from 15 prefectures in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region for prediction,test-retest,and real test,respectively.The reliability and validity of 16PF Uygur version were analysed and the norm of the 16PF was constructed.Results The total score of Uygur version 16PF was correlated with the scores of most of the items with the coefficients of 0.415-0.689(P<0.01 for all).The questionnaire presented a good degree of differentiation.The overall internal consistency coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.827,the half reliability was 0.782,and the retest reliability was 0.600,indicating good reliability of the questionnaire.The validity test showed that every personality item could efficiently reflect its factor and the correlation coefficients among the 16 personality factors ranged from-0.375 to 0.459,with every factor being independent of other factors,demonstrating a good validity of the questionnaire.There were significant differences in warmth(A),reasoning(B),dominance(E),liveliness(F),rule-consciousness(G),social boldness(H),apprehension(O),openness to change(Q1),self-reliance(Q2),and tension(Q4)between Uygur policemen and policewoman(P<0.05 for all).The levels of A,B,emotional stability(C),H,vigilance(L),abstractedness(M),Q1,Q2,and Q4 were significantly different among the police with different education background(P<0.05 for all).The police engaged in different duty posts showed differences in A,E,F,and M(P<0.05 for all).ConclusionThe 16PF of Uygur version has good reliability,validity and differentiation when applied among Uygur police.The norms of Uighur version 16PF are different among the Uighur police of different gender,education,and duty post.

     

/

返回文章
返回