高级检索
倪倩钰, 田俊. 心理弹性量表信度和效度评价及应用[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(10): 1524-1527. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-38
引用本文: 倪倩钰, 田俊. 心理弹性量表信度和效度评价及应用[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(10): 1524-1527. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-38
NI Qian-yu, TIAN Jun. Evaluation on reliability and validity of 14-Item Resilience Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(10): 1524-1527. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-38
Citation: NI Qian-yu, TIAN Jun. Evaluation on reliability and validity of 14-Item Resilience Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(10): 1524-1527. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-10-38

心理弹性量表信度和效度评价及应用

Evaluation on reliability and validity of 14-Item Resilience Scale

  • 摘要: 目的通过对心理弹性量表简表(RS-14)信度和效度的评价,探讨该量表应用于中国成年居民心理弹性测量的可行性,为临床患者进行心理弹性评估提供特异性测量工具。方法采用整群抽样方法,抽取福建省部分市、县、乡镇各级卫生院医务从业人员以及福州市鼓楼区军门社区居民446人,使用翻译为中文版的RS-14进行测量,对该量表信度及效度进行考评。结果RS-14量表包含14个条目,2个公因子,分别为个人能力和积极认知,共解释总方差的60.755%;RS-14总分与SF-36总分呈正相关(r=0.513,P<0.001);1周前后2次测量RS-14总分呈正相关(r=0.812,P=0.000);奇数组和偶数组2个半量表得分呈正相关(r=0.890,P<0.001);整体量表内部一致性Cronbach's α系数为0.928;不同社会支持利用度者心理弹性得分差异有统计学意义(F=23.781,P=0.000)。结论RS-14量表具有较好的信度和效度,可作为测量中国普通成年人心理弹性高低的可靠工具,但该量表是否应用于中国肿瘤患者仍需进一步的深入研究。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the 14-Item Resilience Scale(RS-14)Chinese Version for further clinical resilience assessment.Methods The reliability and validity of the the RS-14 were tested in 446 medical practitioners in Fujian province and residents from Junmen community in Fuzhou city.Results Factor analysis indicated that the Chinese version RS-14 was composed of two factors:personal ability and positive perception,which could explain 60.755 percent of the total variance. The correlation coefficient between RS-14 and mental health subscale in the Medical Ooutcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Sruvey(SF-36)was 0.513 (P<0.001).The test-retest reliability of the overall scale for one week was 0.812(P<0.001).The split-half reliability was 0.890(P<0.001).The internal consistency of the overall scale was 0.928.The differences in the scores of the scale for the participants with different social support were statistically significant.ConclusionRS-14 is good in validity and reliability and could be used in the evaluation of resilience among Chinese adults.

     

/

返回文章
返回