高级检索
孙婉彤, 付蓉. 心力衰竭患者治疗效果标准化院内死亡率评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(6): 813-816. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-35
引用本文: 孙婉彤, 付蓉. 心力衰竭患者治疗效果标准化院内死亡率评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(6): 813-816. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-35
SUN Wan-tong, FU Rong. Assessment of quality of care for heart failure patients with standardized in-hospital mortality[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(6): 813-816. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-35
Citation: SUN Wan-tong, FU Rong. Assessment of quality of care for heart failure patients with standardized in-hospital mortality[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(6): 813-816. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-35

心力衰竭患者治疗效果标准化院内死亡率评价

Assessment of quality of care for heart failure patients with standardized in-hospital mortality

  • 摘要: 目的 基于风险调整思想计算标准化院内死亡率, 合理评价医院心力衰竭的治疗质量。方法 收集黑龙江省20家三甲医院2009年1月—2010年10月入院的1 862例心力衰竭患者病历资料, 采用两水平logistic回归模型构建心力衰竭患者院内死亡的风险调整模型, 利用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型的拟合优度。结果1 862 例心力衰竭患者中, 87例患者在住院期间死亡, 院内死亡率为4.67%。不同特征心力衰竭患者院内死亡率比较, 不同民族、入院时病情、住院天数、心率及是否患呼吸系统疾病、肾脏疾病、心肌病、失盐低钠综合征心力衰竭患者院内死亡率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两水平logistic回归分析结果显示, 年龄较大、有疾病史及患肾脏疾病和失盐低钠综合征的心力衰竭患者院内死亡风险较大, 住院天数较长、入院时病情较轻和患高血压的心力衰竭患者院内死亡风险较小;心力衰竭患者院内死亡风险调整模型的ROC曲线, AUC为0.80, 95%CI=0.75~0.85, P<0.001;风险调整前, 院内死亡率在医院间的变异范围为0~12.82%, 风险调整后, 医院的排序发生变化, 院内死亡率在医院间的变异范围为2.59%~7.62%。结论 风险调整后, 院内死亡率在医院间的变异减小, 粗院内死亡率和标准化院内死亡率对医院的排序不一致, 调整患者风险因素的标准化院内死亡率能合理地评价医院的治疗质量。

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the quality of care for heart failure patients with standardized in-hospital mortality.Methods Data were extracted from the medical records of 1 862 heart failure admissions between January 2009 and October 2010 in 20 tertiary hospitals in Heilongjiang province.Two-level logistic model was used to develop the risk adjustment model of in-hospital mortality for patients with heart failure and the area under the curve of receiver operation characteristic(ROC)was applied to assess the goodness of fit of risk adjustment model.Results Of the 1 862 patients, 87 died during the hospital stay and the in-hospital mortality was 4.67%.The differences in the in-hospital mortality among the patient groups with different nationality, clinical status at hospital admission, length of stay, heart rate and whether having respiratory disease, renal disease, myocardiopathy, and low sodium syndrome were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The results of two-level logistic model showed that the patients at older age and with the history of renal disease or low sodium syndrome had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and those with longer length of hospital stay, with relatively minor illness status at hospital admission, and with hypertension had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality.The area under the curve of ROC of risk adjustment model was 0.80(95% confidence interval=0.75-0.85)(P<0.001).The in-hospital mortality across the 20 hospitals ranged from 0% to 12.82% before risk adjustment.The order of the in-hospital mortality for the 20 hospitals changed after risk adjustment and the in-hospital mortality ranged from 2.59% to 7.62%.Conclusion The variation in the in-hospital mortality of heart failure patients across hospitals reduced after risk-adjustment.The order sorted by crude in-hospital mortality was inconsistent with that sorted by standardized in-hospital mortality and the latter could be reasonably used in the assessment of quality of care.

     

/

返回文章
返回