高级检索
廉颖, 贾存显, 邱惠敏, 张吉玉. 生活满意度指数A量表在自杀未遂研究中信效度分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(8): 1087-1091. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-08-31
引用本文: 廉颖, 贾存显, 邱惠敏, 张吉玉. 生活满意度指数A量表在自杀未遂研究中信效度分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(8): 1087-1091. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-08-31
LIAN Ying, JIA Cun-xian, QIU Hui-min.et al, . Reliability and validity of Life Satisfaction Index A in study on attempted suicide among rural residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(8): 1087-1091. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-08-31
Citation: LIAN Ying, JIA Cun-xian, QIU Hui-min.et al, . Reliability and validity of Life Satisfaction Index A in study on attempted suicide among rural residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(8): 1087-1091. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-08-31

生活满意度指数A量表在自杀未遂研究中信效度分析

Reliability and validity of Life Satisfaction Index A in study on attempted suicide among rural residents

  • 摘要: 目的 评价生活满意度指数A量表(LSIA)在农村自杀未遂和正常对照人群中测量的信度和效度。方法 采用序贯抽样方法对山东省蓬莱、滕州、邹城、利津、莒南、宁阳6个县(市)的407例自杀未遂病例和按照性别、年龄、居住地匹配的409名正常对照人群进行问卷调查;采用Cronbach's α系数、相关系数评价量表的内部一致性信度, 采用结构效度、效标效度和区分效度来评价量表的效度。结果 LSIA量表在自杀未遂组和正常对照组人群中的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.828和0.734, 各条目得分与删除此条目后量表得分的相关系数分别为0.134~0.648和0.095~0.524(均P<0.05), 量表的内部一致性较好;探索性因子分析表明, 自杀未遂组提取出对生活的热情、决心与不屈服、愿望与已实现目标的统一、自我评价和心境5个公因子, 累积方差解释率为52.89%, 正常对照组提取出对生活的热情、决心与不屈服、愿望与已实现目标的统一、自我评价、心境和冷漠消极6个公因子, 累积方差解释率为51.45%;LSIA、Beck绝望量表(BHS)、流调中心抑郁水平评定量表(CES-D)总分分别为(12.20±4.86)、(44.85±20.72)、(13.25±16.59)分, LSIA量表总分与BHS、CES-D量表总分均呈负相关(r=-0.720、-0.715,P<0.001), 量表具有较好的效标效度;自杀未遂组LSIA量表总分为(9.39±4.59)分, 低于正常对照组的(15.00±3.23)分, 差异有统计学意义(t=20.20, P<0.001), 量表具有较好的区分效度。结论 LSIA量表在农村自杀未遂研究中具有较好的信度和效度, 但个别条目仍需调整。

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the reliability and validity of Life Satisfaction Index A(LSIA) in a case-control study on attempted suicide among rural residents.Methods A total of 407 attempted suicides happened from October 1,2009 to March 31,2011 were enrolled in the study.The control was matched with the same age(no more than 3 years),gender and residenctial place as the attempted suicide.The reliability and validity of LSIA was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient,correlation coefficient,construct validity,criterion-related validity,and discriminant validity.Results The Cronbach α values were 0.828 and 0.734 in attempted suicides and living controls,respectively.The item-total correlation coefficients,if the item was deleted from the scale,ranged from 0.134 to 0.648(P<0.05) for the suicide group and 0.095 to 0.524(P<0.05) for the control group.Exploratory factor analysis was carried out and 5 factors were yielded in attempted suicide group,including zest to life,resolution and fortitude,congruence between desired and achieved goals,and self-assessment and mood,with a cumulative contribution rate of 52.89% of the total variance.And in the control group 6 factors were yielded,including zest to life,resolution and fortitude,congruence between desired and achieved goals,self-assessment,and mood and indifference,with a cumulative contribution rate of 51.45% of the total variance.The total scores of LSIA,Beck Hopelessness Scale(BHS),and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(CES-D) were 12.20±4.86,44.85±20.72,and 13.25±16.59,respectively.Criterion validity analysis demonstrated a negative correlation among the scores of LSIA and BHS,CES-D(r=-0.720,-0.715,P<0.001 for all).The total score of LSIA in the attempted suicides was 9.39±4.59,while the score of LSIA in the controls was 15.00±3.23,with a significant difference between the two groups(t=20.20,P<0.001).Conclusion The reliability,criterion validity and structural validity of Life Satisfaction Index A are acceptable in attempted suicide study.However,further research is needed to modify and improve some items.

     

/

返回文章
返回