高级检索
许军, 张远妮, 杨宇花, 姜虹, 徐华丽, 吴娴波, 张翔, 丘金彩. 广州市中青年知识分子生存质量现状及其影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(1): 94-99. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-01-28
引用本文: 许军, 张远妮, 杨宇花, 姜虹, 徐华丽, 吴娴波, 张翔, 丘金彩. 广州市中青年知识分子生存质量现状及其影响因素[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(1): 94-99. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-01-28
XU Jun, ZHANG Yuan-ni, YANG Yu-hua.et al, . Status and impacting factors of quality of life in young and middle-aged intellectuals in Guangzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2016, 32(1): 94-99. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-01-28
Citation: XU Jun, ZHANG Yuan-ni, YANG Yu-hua.et al, . Status and impacting factors of quality of life in young and middle-aged intellectuals in Guangzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2016, 32(1): 94-99. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2016-32-01-28

广州市中青年知识分子生存质量现状及其影响因素

Status and impacting factors of quality of life in young and middle-aged intellectuals in Guangzhou city

  • 摘要: 目的 了解广东省广州市中青年知识分子生存质量现状及其影响因素,为改善和提高其生存质量提供参考依据。方法 采用分层随机抽样方法在广州市抽取2645名中青年知识分子,应用一般情况调查表和与健康有关生存质量测量评价量表(SF-36)进行现场测试。结果 广州市2645名中青年知识分子中,生存质量较差者占15.80%,一般者占66.55%,较好者占17.65%;中青年知识分子SF-36量表的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、总体健康、活力、社会功能、情感职能、精神健康、生理健康、心理健康得分和量表总分分别为(91.04±13.51)、(75.70±34.75)、(75.61±18.62)、(61.63±19.71)、(65.82±16.88)、(82.04±17.23)、(64.97±41.18)、(68.98±16.28)、(76.17±13.44)、(69.51±14.95)和(72.77±12.96)分;中年知识分子与青年知识分子生存质量得分比较,中年知识分子生理功能得分低于青年知识分子,活力、社会功能、情感职能、精神健康、心理健康得分和量表总分均高于青年知识分子(均P<0.05);多元线性逐步回归分析结果显示,体育锻炼越多、睡眠时间越长、工作时间越短、常吃早餐、与家人朋友居住的青年知识分子生存质量得分越高;体育锻炼越多、睡眠时间越长的中年知识分子生存质量得分越高。结论 广州市青年知识分子的生存质量较中年知识分子差;体育锻炼和睡眠时间是广州市中青年知识分子生活质量的主要影响因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the status and influencing factors of quality of life(QOL) in young and middle-aged intellectuals in Guangzhou city,and to provide evidences for the improvement of QOL in the population.Methods A questionnaire about general condition and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36)were used in a survey among 2645 intellectuals aged 18-60 years selected with stratified random sampling in Guangzhou city.Results Among the intellectuals,the proportions of the participants with good,general,and poor QOL were 17.65%,66.55%,and 15.80%,respectively.The average scores of SF-36 were 91.04±13.51 for physical function,75.70±34.75 for role physical,75.61±18.62 for bodily pain,61.63±19.71 for general health,65.82±16.88 for vitality,82.04±17.23 for social function,64.97±41.18 for role emotional,68.98±16.28 for mental health,76.17±13.44 for physical health,69.51±14.95 for psychological health,and 72.77±12.96 for total score. Univariate analyses concluded that the physical function score of middle-aged intellectuals(aged 45-60 years) were lower than that of the young intellectuals(aged 18-44 years),but the scores of other domains of SF-36 of the middle-aged intellectuals were higher than those of the young intellectuals(all P<0.05).Multivariate linear regression analyses indicated that the QOL was positively correlated to physical exercise,sleeping time,having breakfast frequently,and living with family members or friends,but reversely correlated to working time in the young intellectuals; the middle-aged intellectuals with more physical exercise and longer sleeping time had higher QOL score.Conclusion The QOL of young intellectuals is poorer than that of middle-aged intellectuals and physical exercise and sleeping time are main influencing factors of QOL among young and middle-aged intellectuals in Guangzhou city.

     

/

返回文章
返回