高级检索
陈杨, 杨永芳, 邵英, 许雯, 成会荣. 自然人群糖尿病空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白筛查效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2017, 33(2): 199-201. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-02-07
引用本文: 陈杨, 杨永芳, 邵英, 许雯, 成会荣. 自然人群糖尿病空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白筛查效果评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2017, 33(2): 199-201. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-02-07
CHEN Yang, YANG Yong-fang, SHAO Ying.et al, . Efficiency of fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c detection in screening for diabetes mellitus in general population[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2017, 33(2): 199-201. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-02-07
Citation: CHEN Yang, YANG Yong-fang, SHAO Ying.et al, . Efficiency of fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c detection in screening for diabetes mellitus in general population[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2017, 33(2): 199-201. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-02-07

自然人群糖尿病空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白筛查效果评价

Efficiency of fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c detection in screening for diabetes mellitus in general population

  • 摘要: 目的 评价空腹血糖(FPG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)在自然人群中糖尿病(DM)的筛查效果,为DM流行病学调查中DM筛查方法的选择提供参考依据。方法 于2010年10-12月采用多阶段分层随机整群抽样方法抽取云南省6个国家级死因登记报告县/区的3 489名≥18岁自然人群进行FPG、服糖后2 h血糖(2hPG)和HbA1c实验室检测,并应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线获得FPG、HbA1c与DM的最佳临界点及其灵敏度、特异度和曲线下面积。结果 按照世界卫生组织1999年标准,云南省3 489名≥18岁自然人群中正常血糖、空腹血糖受损(IFG)、糖耐量减低(IGT)和DM者分别为2 975人(85.3%)、230例(6.6%)、176例(5.0%)和108例(3.1%);FPG诊断DM的最佳临界点为6.4 mmol/L,灵敏度和特异度分别为86.1%和96.5%,曲线下面积为0.926(95%CI=0.887~0.965),阳性似然比为24.60,阴性似然比为0.14,约登指数为0.83;HbA1c诊断DM的最佳临界点为6.15%,灵敏度和特异度分别为66.7%和87.1%,曲线下面积为0.814(95%CI=0.762~0.867),阳性似然比为5.18,阴性似然比为0.38,约登指数为0.53。结论 在DM流行病学调查中采用FPG筛查DM效果优于HbA1c。

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the validity of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) testing and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) detection in screening for diabetes (DM) in general population and to provide references for selection of DM screening method in epidemiolgoical survey.Methods FPG,HbA1c and postprandial 2-hour blood glucose (2hPG) detections were performed among 3 489 residents aged 18 years or above selected with stratified multistage cluster random sampling from 6 counties or districts covered by national vital registry system druing October to September 2010;optimal cut-point,sensitivity,specificity,and the area under curve of FPG and HbA1c related to DM were obtained with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results Based World Health Organization criteria 1999,2 975 of the residents (85.3%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT);230 (6.6%) had impaired fasting glucose (IFG);176 (5.0%) had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT);and 108 (3.1%) were diagnosed as DM,respectively.The optimal cut-point value of FPG for the diagnosis of DM was 6.4 mmol/l;the value was associated with a sensitivity of 86.1% and a specificity of 96.5%;the area under the curve was 0.926 (95% confidence interval95%CI=0.887-0.965);the positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 24.60;the negative LR was 0.14;and the Youden index was 0.83.The optimal cut-point value of HbA1c for diagnosis of DM was 6.15%;the value was associated with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 87.1%;the area under the curve was 0.814 (95%CI=0.762-0.867);the positive LR was 5.18 and the negative LR was 0.38;and the Youden index was 0.53.Conclusion FPG detection is a more reliable method for DM screening than HbA1c in epidemioligical survey.

     

/

返回文章
返回