Advance Search
Volume 39 Issue 4
Apr.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Yuanping, DING Rui, XIE Hong. Validation of the National Disability Rating Criteria for the Elderly with Long-term Care: a hierarchical model-based empirical analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(4): 467-471. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1139527
Citation: ZHAO Yuanping, DING Rui, XIE Hong. Validation of the National Disability Rating Criteria for the Elderly with Long-term Care: a hierarchical model-based empirical analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2023, 39(4): 467-471. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1139527

Validation of the National Disability Rating Criteria for the Elderly with Long-term Care: a hierarchical model-based empirical analysis

doi: 10.11847/zgggws1139527
  • Received Date: 2022-06-22
    Available Online: 2023-03-31
  • Publish Date: 2023-04-10
  •   Objective  To verify the reliability and rationality of the National Disability Rating Criteria for the Elderly with Long-term Care – Trial Edition using hierarchical model.   Methods  Using complex sampling method and a self-designed questionnaire, we conducted face-to-face interview and onsite assessment among 9 577 long-term caretakers aged 60 years and above in urban nursing facilities in 23 cities of 12 provincial level administrative divisions across various geographical areas in China during March 2022. The collected data were analyzed with analytic hierarchy process, rank sum ratio method and paired Chi-square test to comprehensively evaluate the long-term caretakers' disability degrees and to compare the evaluations with those based on the national criteria.   Results  For the 9 577 valid participants averagely aged 81.43 ± 8.46 years, 80.0% were assessed as having disability and 47.0% as having moderate and severe disability. A four-level hierarchical model was established based on the regression equation (weighted rank-sum ratio [WRSR] = – 0.5679 + 0.2097 × probit) obtained with analytic hierarchy process and rank sum ratio method. Paired comparison with the original hierarchical model, the Kappa value of the analysis was 0.540 (P < 0.001) and the value of McNemar-Bowker test was 3 376.471 (P < 0.001). There were some differences between the two hierarchical models, and the overall coincidence rate between the two models was 63.6% although there were some differences. Of all the elderly long-term caretakers, 566 (5.9%) were assessed as having severe disability based on combined evaluation with the two hierarchical models; whereas, of all the long-term caretakers assessed as having moderate disability using the hierarchical model established in the study, 30.1% were assessed as having severe disability according to the evaluation with the National Disability Rating Criteria.   Conclusion  Based on the analysis using the hierarchical model established in the study, there are some defects in the original hierarchical model adopted by the National Disability Rating Criteria and further researches are needed to address the issue.
  • loading
  • [1]
    李强, 厉昌习, 岳书铭. 长期照护保险制度试点方案的比较与思考 —— 基于全国15个试点地区的比较分析[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(2): 23 – 30.
    [2]
    国家医保局, 财政部. 关于扩大长期护理保险制度试点的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2020 – 09 – 10)[2022 – 06 – 20]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-11/05/content_5557630.htm.
    [3]
    国家医保局. 国家医疗保障局对十三届全国人大五次会议第4582号建议的答复[医保函〔2022〕29号][EB/OL]. (2022 – 07 – 20)[2022 – 09 – 19]. http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2022/7/20/art_110_8613.html.
    [4]
    国家医保局办公室, 民政部办公厅. 关于印发《长期护理失能等级评估标准(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2021 – 08 – 03)[2022 – 06 – 20]. http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2021/8/3/art_37_5692.html.
    [5]
    孙振球, 王乐三. 综合评价方法及其医学应用[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014.
    [6]
    王振杰, 刘蓓, 郭占元, 等. 中国老年人失能情况Meta分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(8): 1671 – 1674. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.08.031
    [7]
    王晓晰, 张志强. 脑卒中患者社会支持与日常生活能力和焦虑关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(4): 501 – 503. doi: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-04-37
    [8]
    蒋曼, 戴瑞明, 宋阳, 等. 基于日常生活活动能力量表的长期护理保险评估结果比较[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2019, 33(7): 26 – 27, 30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-568X.2019.07.0008
    [9]
    冯文猛. 失能等级评估标准公布老年人长期照护加速解题[J]. 中国卫生, 2021(11): 68 – 69.
    [10]
    陈俊磊, 潘伟毅, 王琴, 等. 福建省疫苗追溯系统质量评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(1): 97 – 99. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1130290
    [11]
    徐培兰, 孜克娅·乃吉木, 木日扎提·买买提, 等. 基于秩和比法新疆地区基本公共卫生服务评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(3): 542 – 545. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1124873
    [12]
    国家统计局. 2021年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2022 – 02 – 28)[2022 – 09 – 03]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202202/t20220227_1827960.html.
    [13]
    潘萍, 覃秋蓓. 中国长期护理保险制度模式选择与发展路径[J]. 西南金融, 2022(2): 89 – 100.
    [14]
    石秦川, 杨敏, 柏亚妹, 等. 应用层次分析法和秩和比法构建老年人能力等级划分方式的研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2017, 34(2): 319 – 321.
    [15]
    郭红艳, 王黎, 王志稳, 等. 老年人能力等级划分方式的研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2013, 13(9): 35 – 38.
    [16]
    民政部. 第四次中国城乡老年人生活状况抽样调查成果[EB/OL]. (2016 – 10 – 09)[2022 – 06 – 20]. http://old.cnr.cn/2016csy/gundong/20161010/t20161010_523186698.shtml.
    [17]
    中国保险行业协会, 中国社会科学院人口与劳动经济研究所. 《2018 — 2019中国长期护理调研报告》[EB/OL]. (2020 – 07 – 06)[2022 – 06 – 20]. http://www.iachina.cn/art/2020/7/6/art_22_104560.html.
    [18]
    陈鹤, 刘艳, 伍小兰, 等. 中国老年人失能水平的比较研究 —— 基于四项全国性调查数据[J]. 南方人口, 2021, 36(5): 1 – 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1613.2021.05.001
    [19]
    闫伟, 何梦娇, 路云, 等. 基于CLHLS的我国老年人失能现状及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(10): 1807 – 1811. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.10.021
    [20]
    World Health Organization. WHO multi-country studies data archive: World Health Survey[EB/OL]. (2015 – 05 – 26)[2022 – 08 – 28]. https://apps.who.int/healthinfo/systems/surveydata/index.php/catalog/whs.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article views (242) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Publishing history
    • Receive:  2022-06-22
    • Online:  2023-03-31
    • Published:  2023-04-10

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return